michael thomas nyungi vs energy and water utilities regulatory authority another 2013 tzhc 2232 16 may 2013

michael thomas nyungi vs energy and water utilities regulatory authority another 2013 tzhc 2232 16 may 2013

The applicant should have appealed the EWURA Board of Directors' decision to the Fair Competition Tribunal instead of seeking prerogative orders from the High Court; statutory appeal is the proper remedy.

Citation
michael thomas nyungi vs energy and water utilities regulatory authority another 2013 tzhc 2232 16 may 2013
Parties
Applicant: Michael Thomas Nyungi; 1st Respondent: Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority; 2nd Respondent: Attorney General
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Certiorari, Mandamus, Appeals From Regulatory Authorities
Source Language
English
Administrative Law Judicial Review Certiorari Mandamus Appeals From Regulatory Authorities

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Thomas Nyungi

Applicant

Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority

1st Respondent

Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant can seek prerogative orders of certiorari and mandamus against EWURA's Board decision instead of appealing to the Fair Competition Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant should have appealed the EWURA Board of Directors' decision to the Fair Competition Tribunal instead of seeking prerogative orders from the High Court; statutory appeal is the proper remedy.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Applicant to pay costs