20090311 TZCA Dar es Salaam
The applicant was never served with Third Party Notice nor given an opportunity to be heard in proceedings that resulted in orders adversely affecting his interests, constituting a violation of natural justice and necessitating revision of the High Court proceedings and orders against him.
- Citation
- 20090311 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Willy Misabo; 1st Respondent: The Receiver & Manager NAPOCO LTD; 2nd Respondent: Barnabas Ndika; 3rd Respondent: Emanuel Papian; 4th Respondent: Ndikumana Gwa Magogwa
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision
- Outcome
- Application allowed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Heard, Third Party Notice, Execution of Judgment, Eviction, Revision Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Willy Misabo
Applicant
The Receiver & Manager NAPOCO LTD
1st Respondent
Barnabas Ndika
2nd Respondent
Emanuel Papian
3rd Respondent
Ndikumana Gwa Magogwa
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was denied the right to be heard in proceedings affecting his interests
- 2 Whether the execution and eviction orders against the applicant were lawful given lack of notice
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was never served with Third Party Notice nor given an opportunity to be heard in proceedings that resulted in orders adversely affecting his interests, constituting a violation of natural justice and necessitating revision of the High Court proceedings and orders against him.
Court Disposition
Application allowed with costs.
Orders
- All proceedings and orders pertaining to the applicant, which resulted in his eviction and the demolition of the house, are quashed and set aside.
- The case against the applicant is to proceed according to law from the stage where the 1st respondent asked for leave to file a Third Party Notice against him (8/10/2001).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment