19910917 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The applicant failed to provide a reasonable or sufficient explanation for the delay in applying for restoration of the appeal, and his account regarding the court registry was inconsistent and not credible. The law requires sufficient cause for both non-appearance and delay, which was not established.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19910917 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Mikeli Lileya; Respondent: Zuberi Makulanga
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Restoration of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Restoration of Appeal, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mikeli Lileya
Appellant
Zuberi Makulanga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Restoration of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant showed sufficient cause for non-appearance on the hearing date
- 2 Whether the applicant explained the delay in applying for restoration of the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide a reasonable or sufficient explanation for the delay in applying for restoration of the appeal, and his account regarding the court registry was inconsistent and not credible. The law requires sufficient cause for both non-appearance and delay, which was not established.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed
- Application for restoration of appeal is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Di S.lJ.:C I~IG!:I cou:-~1' OF T/Ji~lJJIA J.T ])I~~ ES Sli.L,_"JiJI . (PC) CIVIL APPT.l:i.L lTOo 79 OF 1906 1J3Df1LLI:.ll Lii(Ji7L. ., (J O O ~ 0 t, ~ 0 0 0 0 ° ., 0 0 0 C <' ., 0 0 I! 0 ~ APPELh\lIT versus ZODERI ].!AI{IJHG '~·i:i-rtA •• o o ~.,.,. • o • • • • • • •·• 0 • • • nESFOl!DEtJT -----·--------·- Ii UL I H G., This io 2..l1 appJ.ic2:~ion :for c:;;:tcnsion of ·~irae n11L1. for rostorc.:l;ion of en n.ppoc.l c.listtl.cscd lJY t~:is Court on 2n. 3.09 1or no11-c.,ppo2.rn.ncc o:t tho .:i,ppollant. Tho f.pplicnnt hnc.l succooc:rully sued tl:.o I:.onpon,.lont for c1. disputed piece of lnncl i11 tho Ifclmrn. Prir11r:.ry Court. The Rcspornlen·b boinc- n.c;ericvecl by -'i;ho L1ccioio11 of tho Prir,1n.r7 Court sttccossiully ['..i)poclcll fo t:10 District Court of Kilomboro. 'l!h.c Appellant f:i.led his 2..ppen.l challcnc,i.nc tho (1ecision of the Dishi.ct Court a.ml 28th Mz;;.rch J.909 -wo..~ the t1..<'.to sot for :100..rinc. B,)th p[l.!'tios uorc r.luly served. ' ; ll i th summons roc_~tir1nc ·i;'1..1or.1 .,.;o a.p poc.,. m-1us 1•11011 ....·• ·.:.:: , ll_.r.-.-..nh 19n9 011 28t11 n.......... u ·',.-.1,_10 Ucspomlcnt, Zu.bori Mnlau'l(-,c',l'lJ'O.J o.r,pen.rocl om~ -~he Appolla.nt c.lid. not n.ppca.r. tho Court <.lisr,ti.ssecl tho c..ppo,~1 t'.nclcr ti.'lc provisions of O f9lXl:X :r 17 (1) o1 "iib.o Civil FTocacll.U'o Coc1o. The t.pplicont is ;\011 soekinc rostorc..tion of llis a.ppcn.l unLl.or J.;lio provisions o:~ 0 J;g;:J:X ro19 o:r the Civil ProccL~urc CoL:.o. fi.s ·:1io o.pplicn.tion uns filocl on)j ·this yco:r, on 4·:i1 July 1991 tho Applic.:--nt ho-s nJ.so invo:cccl the provir::ions of soc-tion 14(1) o:2 ·~.:.10 Lro-t of Lirni tn.tio11 ilc·~, 1971 socki.ne;- extension of tine ·i;o Bc:'.co the ·o.,:Jplicn:i;ion for restoration. Do•!;h the Applicant ru1J. ·i;he ~capon,lent :ippoc.ro:1 in person •. Tho oxc;ur.10nts o:r l>o·i;l1. pmtics a.t the J.1011:rine:; of tliis n,pp1icn:aon ucrc conccn-'cratccl i:1 sl1oilin,3 uhothor or no·i; ·i;llc ..'...' pplic::int was prcvcntc~l h;: sufficiont cnusc from appcnr-inc ~n 2D·i;l/1ta-:rch 1989 .-rhcn -'che n.1>poc.l uas tis1aissoa. il.cfor.onoo to -'i;hc delay in o.pplyinc fol' 1•estora.-'cio11 of tho a.ppe~l wa.s cr~su...11 ::mu inr.liroct, ' I cm therefore left wi·~}1 only tho Cl.f'ficlo.vi-t of 1~1x10,lfo.l1 Lil~~a, ·~j1c Applicnnt; filat1. i11 support o:i: ·i;:~e c.'..lr.ii1bor' n,pplicc:1iion 1 I u:i.11 stn.rt with "i.l1c c.pplicn,-'i;ion ~- for azfonsion of til:1c t1mlcr -tho Limi tr::tion lw'~• fut first nn ouUino of -'iiho foots. Tho dispute rol<'.:~cs -'i;o o. pioco of lcn~1.. loft by 0110 Dinti IlcjulJU at IG.bnoni a.roa, in Ifnl:ar.:i. tonnsllip, The ln.to J3inti ili-,jo..bu tliecl in 1976 1'.\Jt.l tile nospondont, atbori M."'..kul1;3'::il1,Yn. sou.(;'1.d; -'.;o inhcri t tho piece of lru1c.l she !:i.nd occt.tpioc.l bccn,uso Bin ti nn.ja.bu wns tho cl.:1.uc;ll·~o1.. of the ncsponc~cnt 's brother. T'.u.c cvitlcncc shons tlmt Dinti ~njo.bu movc:1. from Dorarutl c.:r:00, ui th.in Ifn.ko:ro.. Township, -'i;o t.ut 11011 : '2 : \ n.rce\. n.t Kibc.oni n.s a. 1·e::::d·~ o:Z 0por2/i;ion Vijiji c.1urint; the couiri;ry-wiclo campni::,,.1 to cstn.blich Ujc.r.1c...., Villc.;~;cs. r:i:lrn l:..pplicnnt wc.s a.lrcr.i1..y livi11c; at Kibn.oni ,.lurinc- this pe:.:iocl. n.ml ::;o ho lln-:'1. 110 oblicsa.tion to find n. now pln.ca. Bin ti Xkjn.1)U wa.s C.iiWll{~- nov-o:;.•t'l people who ].10J.l ·to move from Domr:.ni to Xi ba.oni. There is conflictinc c•vi(:.onco a.s to wI12:t 1:.<-'. (.1. ha.pponc.l when Bin•ti It.·.jc.bu cot to Kibc.oni. ·Accortlinc to -~l10 Applicant tho 100111 authori tius hC,(.l t1iroc-tell those who wore n.lrouly livinc in Kilx1011i to oocommo::.ln:l;c those uho uorc comincr in fron Bomn.ni n.r:.c: olncuho1°0 tcmporcrily 1i::ulo nrronc;omonts were bci11c mtli.l<, to survey ncu pieces o:Z lc.n~: to be a.llocc..toLl. ·i;o them. il.ccorc1inc-ly he uclcornC<l Bin ti Ilcjn.bu in a. sma.11 r.mi'. !.iut ru1cl · (~.:we 2::.o:r n. piece of lmu. nxotmc.l i -~ for her . to · err ow crops. Bin ·~i nc..jn.bu ::.lie~". two yotcJ.'s l.::i.-'i;or o.n.l' tho Rcspomlcnt ~ri voe\ elm.mine to be ;.1or hail· • ., Accordinc to tho nospo~1L'1.011t nm:. 0110 Lt10n,s Hsc11r.;il0l1<.lct (m!3), w!10 wcs f \ tho cc;11 J3rc,no;1 Cb.cir-w:i..n 1 J~hc 1nnc1.. occupicLl 7),'{ Dinti R~.jn,bU, was oric.::ina.lly owned by tho J.ppliccnt but i·~ ir2.:::: ln:tor ci,von to ].,_er by the Div:i.sioncl Socro·~~.ry who l~n.s responsible for a,llocc.tinc pieces of lcaL: to tho new colilors. lt wo.,s cloiracc.l tho.t the lond :1clcl; by the /1.1,plicnnt wn.s norc Ji;l1an the pcrmi t·~<Kl size of 30 by 30 motrca. In fGct he !1::'J..l 60 ~JY 30 metres. Tho trin.l cou:rt fow1c'1. for tho Applicant who hru.1 suet~ Zubori l-Ic2;1.1.11c2.rga. for vc..ccJ1t possession, Tho Dis-'i;;rid; Cou:r-'c on o.ppool rcvorsc('1. tlio fintlinc of the Pl'ino.ry Cot:rt rnc.l cave the clispu•;;e,l r,iccc of lm1cl ·to tho Rooponclcn·;;. Ec:.1ce tlus nppc~,l. I h~1 inuicatci1. o~.i:liur tlrnt the Applic;_mt },r:.s also r.1Q.C.lc ru1 n.pplicc..tion w1clc:t' section 14 (1) o:Z -;;.;.10 LcJ,1 ;f Lirai·c:~·~ioa ,i.ct, i971. Tho scc·;;ion provides o.s followss "14 - (l) Ifo·L1ri -chstc:mlinc ·i;hc :,):i:ovi.si :ms of t.'1is i~ci·~, tho com·t i7tcy for o..ny roa.sonn.lJlo or f:v.ff:1.cicnt ca.uso 1 cxtontl the porio~l of limi to/.;ion for the institution of an r:.ppocl or nn c,pplic,,:tion 1 ofaer than ru.1 c.pplicc:aon for -'i;:10 caccu·tion: of n tlocrco, ~1~:. a.n a.ppliord;ion for such c::~tcasion ,:1cy bo mru:1_e either l)oforo or ni'Ji:;cr tho m:piry ot tho pcrioc1.. of lir.1i·cction proscribc.:.1 for s1..tch · a.ppcnl 01' c..11i)lic::-:cion. 11 ~_,,., fo., ..... .t.T,0:r-1••,- I.IU.... 1 --v - l n ".Y ( L!HrA 0 Tr.'u' , ,.,)1.2 •.,'•o '"" n.1:p1y .i:or .r, i• Ji;s rcr:rcorc:.. • t• ·ion. is whether the Appdl.'.')1·~ :·.e,s sui'ficic1r~ cr:.ttsc ·i;o C.ii:plo..in tho c1.clcy tui·i;:tl 4th July 1991 w:1cn ho :ZiJ.c:1. thia ~.~,plication~ .', .,, thio ['.pplicc.,tion lie nc.i:.le enquiries twice c..t ·li:J.C IIich. Court rocia·~ry of-'licr the or~1or c1.ismisst~::; _:_:is c,ppccl. 'E1c firs-'i; oooa.□ion wo.n on 5th 1~p1•il 1989 when ho U[l.S tol,l by C'.. c;J.er:;: -~o go oJitr:,;y r:.s ho ui 11 be inforne(l 1-::.for by summons from the court. :::1:.lo scconJ occn,::iion wc.,s in July 19D9 ulrn::.1 he wc..s tolcl tho srunc story 2.s in April "iiith nn w..':.c:.i-cion th'1:b the court file hru:l. clisn.ppon.:rccl c.nd so ho should wci.-~. He c1..iL: not aa}: :for :10~r lonr; ho ::;houlcl ur..it.. IIc aa.clc no fu:r-~b.01· oncruirios u::.rtil -~1ro yoc..rs lr.,tcr ·on Ist July 1991 when :.ic we..::: inf ormccl thu.t his cc..sc hnd n,l:I'er.,1;/ ~Jeon tlismissct1.. since Hn:rch 1989. 0-a ~--~11 Jnly 1991 ho filocl this n,pplic~:.-~im1. It ci,ppcc.rs incrc(!.il)lo -~-~1::,_;i; the Applior::.i.1·i; s~wuld be content n.ncl a.'.:,TCO -'i;o rso hor,10 ~1ll um t for omu.10:.w l1c.vinG co,ae r..11 -~ho •:Tt'.lf from If c.1'"..cxc.. Ile s~ys in his c'i'i'L1c.vi t th;-.·i; ~.1.q llo.:.l cot1c to cou..rt "i:.1 or,.lor to know tho poci•~ion" of' his -c.1sc ;:,. m1 yet the l'C(,1.r.:r~::y clerk Pnto ~1im ol'f 1Jy c1. pror.1isc 'to sen·,1• l2im a ol.Ui1:1ons. In pc.r0.:,-Tr.,p..1 5 o-:Z the ~,:'fic1..c.:viJi; -~he .L'1.pplicc.J.1,t scys he tro..vclloL'. o...0 cdn • • • • l from I:fokc.rn. to Di:'J.' os Gc..ln,c.m in July 1989 011:I_y to bo tolc.l tho sa,rn storJ~ by tho Tho l1.pplicm1 t n::iy 1)e fo1'e;i von for not lc.101;inc "iihu nc.md of t:10 rcc;is-'.i:ry clerk who hru:l mislo.:.l lti,.1. Du:~ ;10 cc..n:.10-i; be f or-:3'i van :for 1-mi tine for 6. pcrioC:. oZ t1ro yon.rs before mcldncs furtl1c:c encfLUl'ics• )3osic1.os, tho Applicant's story in his o..:2':Zirlc.vi t clif:fors nc.;~01°inlly from thc:t which he tole'.. ·;;l.i.c coLu'-~ in tho courne o:Z l1in ou1Jr.1i:::sions. 1-Thon rac'..l;:lnG his subr::1isoio110 ,the Applic~Yt; s~.i..:1. he i,K,.c'..c tlle cnq~tiries 0t t:1e Dis~uric-'i; Court in If nko..rc1, ro11 110Ji; 1:'.·~ -~.10 IIits:1 Court in Da:i: cs :J,~l[i..:u-,1., ·Ho even rcmomborod tho nru1e of ·i;hc alert: r-.:c -~he.: D:i.s·~rict Court ~s one JrbC.n.llnh•. It .1,ppcc..3'.'s ·;;;.tc'.:t the Ji.pplicrni-i; hi:ll..l :forc.,·9ttc.1 -~he..·~ :lU hl'..L"!. filo.".. ri..11 ci'fic'..r::vi t in uhich ;.10 (1..opoooc.l thc.t ho wao r.uslc<.l by n. clcrlr. o..t -tho IIi-sh CoLU t rc:::_-j,st:i.•y in Do..r cs Sda.r-n-i. 0 ~ , serious doubt thcrd'oru .i.;.;:i;.1::::;s on tho t:ru·~-'l of tl1c Gtory o.bout th<: coui·-t file di snppoc'..l•inc or boinr; tolQ -to c;o h:w!:: llor:w C\.lL:. udt :COJ.' CV Sllrilii!OllfJ fron the co1..u·t, I en therefore cons·;;ro..ine.:'. to I:ol,'."!. t~~.ct t::o I~pplicn.nt h<'.O fdl<.:cl to t cxplmn the dclGy in o.,pp],::'inc; for rcstor,.:;;io:a.1 oZ .".:is n,ppcn.l. The lcJT requires him to shou rcc.son ..blo o:r au:.::•ficient c~tsc i':.nJ :.1c.. :u:.s :1,i. van 11011c to o:-.:pbin This c..pplicc.tio;1 -t;~ie:ro:'.:oro fc.ilo 1."'..n,"!. nust be disuissoi..le IIis r:.pplic0,;i;io11 for restoro.;tion clso :.:'c,iln. It is true t'.1c.,·:; -~lie i.pplicr-.nt wns rocoiVine; mcc"!.ica.l. tror,tii1ont r.:t St. Frc..ncio :.~onpi tn,l in If.-~:;:c.r:., on 25th, 28th n.nd 29-cb. Ib.rch 1989 nnc'.. so COL'.Ll not 2.p::_,c..--..r in court on 20th li~:c:1 1989 when tho o..ppod Hc,s JiSL1issocl for non-n.:)pca.rtincc. DL:-~ hi::i subooquont con:1.uc"ii shous that he ln.c~tccl seriousness in purst.ti.nG his cc.,sc, T!.10 O..l)l)liC<Ltion is :lis.ais8o:.1. ui th costs. Dclivcrorl in c~1r.r:1l;c:i:-rJ .1t Dn;r cs St\ln,"1.r,1 this 17th C':.;:,.y o:f Sopte1~focr 1991 in ·i..ho presence of 1.1x'icllcl1 Lilc..,ya - Applio.:~rt.