milan cable television limited vs labour officer arusha and another 2021 tzhc 7658 7 december 2021

milan cable television limited vs labour officer arusha and another 2021 tzhc 7658 7 december 2021

The existence of alleged illegality in the Labour Commissioner's decision constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time, even if the applicant failed to demonstrate other sufficient reasons for the delay.

Citation
milan cable television limited vs labour officer arusha and another 2021 tzhc 7658 7 december 2021
Parties
Applicant: Milan Cable Television Limited; 1st Respondent: Labour Officer Arusha; 2nd Respondent: Labour Commissioner
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Misc. Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Compliance Order, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Overtime Allowances, Settlement Negotiations
Source Language
English
Labour Law Extension of Time Compliance Order Illegality as Ground for Extension Overtime Allowances Settlement Negotiations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Milan Cable Television Limited

Applicant

Labour Officer Arusha

1st Respondent

Labour Commissioner

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for delay in filing appeal
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in the Labour Commissioner's decision constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of alleged illegality in the Labour Commissioner's decision constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time, even if the applicant failed to demonstrate other sufficient reasons for the delay.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant to file intended appeal within 14 days of the order
  • No order as to costs