mkandila tambo vs tanesco others 2013 tzhc 2114 19 march 2013

The application was made under wrong and non-existent provisions of the law, failing to properly move the court; thus, the application is incompetent and must be struck out.

Citation: mkandila tambo vs tanesco others 2013 tzhc 2114 19 march 2013
Parties: Applicant: Mkandila Tambo; 1st Respondent: TANESCO; 2nd and 3rd Respondents: Attorney General's Chambers, Dodoma Office
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 19 March 2013
Procedural Posture: Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Legal Defect
Outcome: Application struck out as incompetent.
Legal Topics: Judicial Review, Wrong Citation of Law, Prerogative Orders, Competence of Application
Source Language: English

Administrative Law Labour Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Wrong Citation of Law Prerogative Orders Competence of Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mkandila Tambo

Applicant

TANESCO

1st Respondent

Attorney General's Chambers, Dodoma Office

2nd and 3rd Respondents

Procedural Posture

Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Legal Defect

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application is competent before the court due to citation of non-existent and wrong legal provisions

Ratio Decidendi

The application was made under wrong and non-existent provisions of the law, failing to properly move the court; thus, the application is incompetent and must be struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent.

Orders

Application struck out for citing wrong and non-existent legal provisions.
No order as to costs.