mohamed ally sudi sudi vs republic 2019 tzca 523 28 february 2019
The trial judge's remarks were in compliance with section 293(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and did not prejudice the appellant's right to a fair trial. The appellant's voluntary intoxication did not meet the statutory requirements for a defence, and malice aforethought was established by his words and actions.
- Citation
- mohamed ally sudi sudi vs republic 2019 tzca 523 28 february 2019
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohamed Ally @ Sudi Sudi; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Fair Trial, Intoxication Defence, Malice Aforethought
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohamed Ally @ Sudi Sudi
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was denied a fair trial by the trial judge's remarks at the close of prosecution case
- 2 Whether the defence of intoxication was available to the appellant
- 3 Whether malice aforethought was established
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's remarks were in compliance with section 293(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and did not prejudice the appellant's right to a fair trial. The appellant's voluntary intoxication did not meet the statutory requirements for a defence, and malice aforethought was established by his words and actions.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed in its entirety
- Conviction and sentence affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment