mohamed mashina vs tanzania women bank plc and another 2020 tzhcld 419 13 october 2020

mohamed mashina vs tanzania women bank plc and another 2020 tzhcld 419 13 october 2020

The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons for the delay, did not account for each day of delay, and did not substantiate the alleged illegality with evidence or attach the CMA award. Therefore, the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Citation
mohamed mashina vs tanzania women bank plc and another 2020 tzhcld 419 13 october 2020
Parties
Applicant: Mohamed Mashina; 1st Respondent: Tanzania Women Bank PLC; 2nd Respondent: TPB Bank PLC
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 October 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitral Award, Sufficient Cause, Labour Dispute Procedure
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision of Arbitral Award Sufficient Cause Labour Dispute Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Mashina

Applicant

Tanzania Women Bank PLC

1st Respondent

TPB Bank PLC

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant provided sufficient reasons for extension of time to file revision against the CMA award
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality of the CMA award constitutes sufficient ground for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons for the delay, did not account for each day of delay, and did not substantiate the alleged illegality with evidence or attach the CMA award. Therefore, the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to file revision out of time is dismissed for want of merits.
  • No order as to costs.