19771031 TZHC Mwanza
The conviction was unsafe as the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to the lack of direct evidence, failure to call the auditor as a witness, and inconsistencies in the evidence regarding receipt books and the amounts allegedly stolen.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19771031 TZHC Mwanza
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohamed Mihambo; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Theft by Servant, Burden of Proof, Evidentiary Value, Mismanagement of Evidence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohamed Mihambo
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for theft by servant was supported by evidence beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved that the appellant received and misappropriated the funds in question
- 3 Whether the omission to call key witnesses and produce primary evidence was fatal to the prosecution's case
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was unsafe as the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to the lack of direct evidence, failure to call the auditor as a witness, and inconsistencies in the evidence regarding receipt books and the amounts allegedly stolen.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside.
Orders
- Appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
1/19/l /4f)tL/f-~ ,J.f-1:~: c.:. ~xr..oE: 11c!x~.11\:i..~ !\'I' v'.·!ANZA _ i~l:-P~L~!:i;:i"" __ J~H~SlHCI':i.ON . H1GH en· _.(11 _CJ..::.1rciN,";,L., APP.2:1,i NO. _249 OF 1977. ~::-. .. ;...: .. - -. ;· ·. :...·. . CF. .iDV. ';!JC·. 2.4/77.~- Ci~•·· ..... ·. ·~\ i; 1 ( Or ig,in~ 1 Crim i,.a i Cc: se· i':_6. ' -6.~ .of ·.1~f7 ._·9·f }he J istr ict Ci>_~rf ff'._'_.cfe'i~a_ . -Distil'.'ic..-t, . . . at Geita. - B.:J.::'c.::•/ . .... s·. N. £uberwa, . . $sq.; Sanior i'-1agistra'te; ' . •• ·• .J. ' ' • • • • • • • • • • ~ • • ·: "'. - :. : • • ; ' •· • ,, ~ '• : -MOHAMJ;J)_ ?".J.,:liH·Ti3Q. • • o • • • " , • ~ ,.! • • • • • • • • • • • • • o.• • • • • • • o ••a•••••.•• •/lf'.PELLf\NT _I , • • • •• • • • ~ ~ • .,._ • • -versus THE:. REPU-Bi fc .................,•.•_•.•.••.•.••...••••••••••••••.• ~ •• ·RESPONDENT .· .. f :f"' ; ., ' . :. .1: • • . , . , , • , . , • . ·, •, ••.-;i,. I ' . ' .1 ...... 271 of the Pen2l Code· . ': 't .·_.•1 t' ,: K,~ TIT I, J, : .. '. . '.,::-·.ae.ita .Dist''iiicit', 9Glpr_t_,.,con,victep.- Moha_mei . ¥ihambo ·t'.1e appel:J;.ant, of ""-the"ic5f'f:enc·e of sie!:tlfog by serva!'lt_ an~ s:entenced him to. four-:• years impr~:i)sortmeht. · Th:Ui':s0rl.tence, wa_s a,opomp~_ted. PY an ord~r f.or :i _;refund, o-fr.srrs.!'2.0;.oo-?/5G,'··t'.\~~--- ,·1~ourit· ~Ja.imed stol.en-• .The·_ appellant· foevitaibly ~agglri.e·'7-ed{:iras' 16d{,'3t., -Shis·'appe•l,"" to thi:s- -court._ , ... -~--: .. J' ~: :.-.,:: ; { (. - :.; ·:... . ·.. ·:·~r J<. t 1 -~:- • i _1 / • : • '.:·~~- ;~ -::,· Th'e \aprell/"1-i;, vehimen,tly_ ·sub_mi.tted -while _pros,~cic·cing bis ,appea·l, 'tha-i?theJ:'i3word of 'J.:.:,,J fel,l.,o,n .. him, wJtho.ut the case... bGi,ng pf:oved"beyond F~asiiriabii doubt.·, 1Ie..subrr<:itted, that tp.-J .auditor wh.o exaroj.ped the books, and repofl,t'ed: -thing:-:;: &:-0:o:Ut and oig':l.inst.. him., ,did .not give e~-:iil~nce.,. t_o afford .qi_m _;=rn oppo;:tunity to examine '.him. ·rhe appel lRnt added, tha·t . •i · _P.Wf ·w,as. i\:>,a,.sical ly _a 'i-{J'::!r say teller/ a~ he••d:{d- not exam:i.no ·the· figures, • ,,. . i~_ef 1 .fhij'<p;Js_ ev:L:1.~11_c'-1 wa~ -P~_eju~i?ial. _ l'he ·appelhnt .urged·, ;iJ;J,e i:fo~~d '"• b~J>k1~,'_;-,Q~~990~-: 40,000, v1ii3 w111ch ~moun-ts- Shs~ 7,578/60J)i.ni rece':{p1t \iJ;q<i,~.lc ')~·:o_.! ·_02il501 - 4160·0, relev3nt co'_ Shs~ · 1a,-424/90, idre .rrot r zcei ved ·,·by.htm.-··:·on the o·fa-xm' ·'ia,nd', 1'.1.r·s, ~r.:itovu 1 --the le3rnel· 3Jc=·t;3 Ilttorney 1 "' f» 1 r) • ·- , • · r · a'pp~az:tri'g for t:1e .{0pl;_"clic.,'mai,~·t":t·iri2d, tl1at as the C~SG" -3t'ood, she .could not ·'~Wi.'pcfrt "convitt:;on',- Jiithout :it '.;he sarr.e ·time ioing C:;rievo-us·,.in.jiur-y, 1 '·'\J';.:;fust"i6"e. · .;,, ·' : :, · ______ I shall L ,.c 11.r t.irou~·r.i the record, to see if tho appellant's ~-gLJ,t~r:~1,·· ~s just. - I s}~.:lf e-i.~mtne the recorJ. as :: whole, for !one man's ...,. :worq° ,..., is no . rrian.' s :rord ~ -1.n,±'e ed ··f1a ving . scr ,ut in is 3d. tl1 G....~ 8Co,.rd., . heard. t.he s\ibmissions from -~,_10 R.epU:(?lic arld the ·defence; I discOV8l~ no,.cornplacence, fri il-i'e trial m?~,:ii;·ia'2;c.2: :r<emark, thJt "thi~ ·ca·se is very sir:-,ple·,_to 1 jud.ge"• First, the obvio·us is, th;it the. appelhnt w9.s ::rn .:,mployee of Tanzania Cotton .1~uJchorjt;y-, '·h~~e{n to'·be refe.rrel to, ?.s 2bbreviated - T.C.A, The appelJ.:::.11t~ ',-1as~3·br):1di·m::imger of-one of ·i;i:le T.C.fi •. cotton zone·s, known as K.:•.s: m~J,~:" From the letter of ·:1.:ppointrr.o.,t to such post, · a9cor,npar.iied by his ~,c~H:::,:l;de of work,.. the 3ppelbnt we.s •r.C.li-• Zonal· · E~ec·µt)y~ · Offic_ar 1 ·.:-:dh power's rei'~v'~nt, apd_, rehtad to :such:'.job,knowing .. wrry f~w'bounJs. 1rht: ~ppe1ltint·i W'3S tci in1'k,_e .sure:, thc't.th.e:·cottort· ·,,_ . . ::industry-in his ·zt:ii~0/'&nJoyea 'pr·osper·ityj to 1 buy cottont;'p0y-r21ated ,.- ..-, ·debts, :and; affec-t.rok{:;J.3r•·payment~,,co-ll'ect··and :1cco,u1.1-t', =i;'or :r~la-t-ed,. paymen·ts. ,..,· t'· ,. .; , -:-•.-. , . . . , . .· -t'.".· ·For. :-,ork, rubted to··i:1e colJ.ection of fun.is, tl1a·. :=1pp-e:1.'lant had ,. to··make use of reci:'.i)c-'bcrbk'~. iihan it: com''°s' -to the qu.0\;;tiO:h ,- as'. .to.··h.ow this was to b8.accoL:n:.ted for,· wa have the only pros0cation witnGss called Timothy Ngusa·, :r!b:';;. ct8gioria1 :lcc·ounhnt, t~stify th•t ·:tho collection were suppos~d tci i_, ... roi-rii'tte·d_ ··tb' T_--C,.i, 'Heai.fqu3rtars Mw,\.nza, <;1lthough, we learn from this s-::;-i) tgusa ;·~hit; th'8 a"pp,211:mt a'ctu.3.l13r rom:itted. some· n\oney to Mwanza, r--.~J/_ 'h::::nkeJ sorr:2 in Geite N:1tion~:1 Bank- of Commerc~. Why ,-some_, ,money wa.s .J,,,;,pJ:.,.:;9-:~, a.nu. not: _dir~ct}y /3en t to_ HQf<~qu:cirteJs:-.,., ry;:q: ives no explanation frc.,;:: :::-:'.;L1,:8 7 3ml, 3S to how much was t)"::nkoc.1 1 M4, _hqw mµch was remitt~J to th0:jH\:.·dqu3rters 9nu.;when,_is the Pro::,.e.o,t:tj:'~•;{,'s'·s~~ret. Having found -it J:)OJ:;'';,i(:lq, ~o ex..tract the resp0!1Sibili ti-0s of the appellant, from the litt.la :J"¼:~.'~,:.._;:,:;;,;; ,y9.-_:i:12,__t~EJ, __ :-1Q st.ill ..cem,,in ;1t.s0a 7 whether the appeli,mt p;:irso1F_.:::.;_ ....... :s.,3ci:L.:.c;.!9J.,th~_se functions. Mr• ·l'J;iUsa, an insider ~j\•-~!.}tJ..:}} :1~s_ ·;_;_:,_~1,J::._.:-::-_;_ ~c:...".l, --~.i,'-:.cs r"~p.G,'.:;t.,_ But :-i.1v:i.n-£ Cc "'"G my nets wider •••2 3no.· (:;:_:{'Jr,::;_n-::u. ~--; :·.'.,~;'.") :·,t vook:s, ::inJ. fl":vi:ig not:.,d, th-:t;· .:."evunue receivitlg ' sigmiturcs, diffo:i.;,Jnt:j.2~~- them~_31',i..,s, through .iettar form::tions>. 1 sh9ll let myself s::1tifi0,'.; ·'.·lF.t tht ;;p0~l:;;nt h3J. ':!Ssishnt fu.nctiomries "I, • • • .._ • • I -i ~det:~him••,;' .j_nl whv.i;j_-3r su~J;l. functipnarlio~, ~-rnre respo.:u~iqla to th.e appell~~;:fl°or ,f'unclq pr j_"~vepu.J f ~Ce ivod. by t~0m,. seems ·i;o. h6ve 1iof . ·:.: qualifi2d;·to .J~ ,.,::::· r,(nific·nce in°tt1o'ey~s of the _p·r,,•3-.,cution.: Hbwever, cOnsi.4.l;l~~ng. t~) tt~1t ...;:c;9 t. :;: 1j,. ~rr+~ ~!}91!1~ i . L it+. GC) . :'.~knowl~Jge .,the., rwo. fl'.lct,. th3t, th3- 2,: ~".;i·,:·nt ·r?s'fin"'llly- tne custo ..ti·rn -:if tl1-:.: funds ·collected 9 in the process ,:,f ·;;,,,) ::.'unct1c:1s of. i.Jis,..luty. from• tl'lY g-:;:: •,~'.-~. li •to• t~1e" .D~ .rt icnb r i • it, is ?:J.o t. ,:,; : ~:_r,1:G:tad.· th:: t on 14/6/1975 P,Jl N:s•.t_:;:2 1 ·, ~J.c.~. th0 accused. suty receipt oook for which the appelLrnt· si;;ne:l, · Di' >,1:.;'J.egist-ar- Z:ixh-Pl,; ·'P,H tcl.l t~~~ court, thid, ..smong the sixty rec-a::.;:,-t IJ,·1•);::-s, hicH'e r•3c2:i.;:;t book.•Nos 039901 - 40000; P.l;ia_-·-14-,rf501 416000, vile both ~.::- 1.;':.ich, the a:;_:i"pellant coll,::ctd Shs_. 20,003/5·t"'!',. the amount cbimel w12.c.;c.~••.;1ted for, ,rnl:.f.9:t:oi;iJ~g t!lG b:1sis :rf' th0 ch::inge,,the appellant is f~c ni• The app8l ~nt's contention, is th1t he did not r8ceive these bobi<::°s· .. ' Ti': !the cont0:1tion· is' j'ust·, -the-n i11Je:3·J, ·yo·u C:!: ..1~ic:t ,use 'for cd-:IT~fot iBi{ ivho1 t :.c'r_,:: :,i ·not exi:st:/: · I htVe :ser·.fo usly exr,m.j,n-.::d· :. :a.egist;e.r ~ -'[ij5r_h/ ·P.l a·nd startl i;1,:,ly"~ I ·d.i·sco·var·.i, th::i-t ,th~ st::irred -;,,_nd .r::re;le•v.3ni:ly, :, i 1 fo'd id~·e'a.:'. Te'ca ipt Le :ks;,.:_ I\1,:ifs,: 1',l'r'e ;No0 sr.·::,fJ990-1 ;_:40000' ?)1\..l' 4).501.,"."'.":ran'd·, 0 not 039901 - 40000 1 or"'D44,1.5oi :i.' 41:6COQt;,. re,spect i ve ly. · L -abs13rve,: ·.t.h.;1,rt the omission of a zero behin..i the numbers, mak~s the diffe:r<mce; but ·:r ·atiud.&er to assume, tl12't: t-'hese':,wel'e the s3me; rece,ipt boDk;s, ,'.th:it Pvll a_ --1;~--l'ks' 9:bo Lit~ 'rhus, if 'th-:: ·3 ppel:i. 1-nt ,con te·sts, th~ t he -~~i::Lnot re-ce·i ve ~ •; ,; 1:-""e:d_l3ipt _ b?oks ..!Jxhs, P2 2nd: F3 as p·ar: ,iagist'er l£xh_. Pl, ,,t1c1t ;evi\l.en-c-E: -is AA. theret· to·· s·to·p me f:..·r:rn sustai1ri''.i:ng,· th:a '3ppella·nt's contc11:tion;••J-: 1 .·, •• , •• .... • .· ·_.q"; .;:· .: : :·.i. ··. ·~. . . '! ,,.. : . . ... ,, L have observ'"J. ..i;:ich• p5,;. Th).s1 ).s, 9n1 Inspection .lc.::::P.qr,~ 1:iy ..T.·,:c~i',., :'tlrJJFna+_,,~_u.:htor. It mnkf3;S r_a-fu.anc_a,: i~~-.~tpc3ipt book\ l\Jo·s•.. :0,3?~sr -:-· 039,999 a·nd·· 041501:,r _04160.0 1 clda..rn, t-hey'. dq;,Jlot. co::rFes?on.:i to .:~.1.e•::_nµmberi3 _g_1ven by PW1 .Ngusa. . ·I1h is. :::-.Jv_:o::r;t1, ;sh.p~_s· t_he :'1n t_er_na_l ,11 uJ'j_ ten~.. c,cnc;<~rn ,; ,put_, ht"3, J id not ·-comB.·•to give uvi,\J11co, .9,ri~J. ,h..:;-s_-,r390,rt te,n_clerei t11r,,:. g~_ .:thi:;,~ ;~ar:ty 1 a. _ a-s ·he .J:iJ. not giv0 -.:i,::i:.:·,)n~3 .·i$: in,a,imiss-~bl~:~· ·: This ;•~:?or:,t .fJ?S .~e_.qif·eri:id;" 1by.-PvH, ~who '1o3s nr,t profess ~Q have )se~-n -i.i: ;:l?eing writ:ton. , r:·m~ift .'.,'' therefore say, tl13.t ~.xh. PS, should. not hava been simitJCOLi°, ~i,:-~ -·~as''no /s. evidentinal value. · ·· · . ! . '. :. ~; .l'lhile I n:.=:.v;) ;;; i_J. 1 ;th,3.N was J?.O. ev:1,-tance, th::;t -t;:1.:i appe1lant . :-, a;lGCeived ,Receipt "boc, 1~s :i;:ir:h~f2::•,and<:PJ ,j"{~:;, -~a,iis~ar Ex.2;;;:f.+~ tlie :qu~-~~,ion ~=,;whet·hu_r·h:e JiJ :'.1-~t l'()C8i'l~-t_hem 9t 911·,.,pricks mY mins.1 •. ·:.~"t:y:,~s:nq(·.-~-f:l my via~, -.-by accil.:mt, -!,;:-et the a.l?P.'fll~nt:. h~r?,s_alf ,. tolJ th-:; ·c:i: is 1 cou~_f as. follows, and I quo·0c ~1im:- , . t . . n ! .· ,, :. ·.; "I r-.,9,.,:ivo:l the 2 rec::,ipt _ books.(=iccus:d_rGr_ors. ,...... , to .~:,~h.,. P2 :ind. P3). 3ni collac~eJ tharain 1 t_hEl ,11;· ' - · mo~1oy $.11s~_·.20;003/50_3s chF.1 ~geJ._ 1: ~::::·.·::; ~-:•.. • ' 1 .·.·: .\ ··; "~ :'.-,,(, ... rlith fois t::stimon}$,l e:i;r:9er.p:tL 1 c~n1;1ot ev3n wit];:;c~fof,~i:i'_:;~:·io· lo, avoid tho- con~lu.s:i.~:~1, i;;h:1t, 1;h3 ::1pp~.i.}.fl~r:JiJ r.:iceive' ,f~l1~P~ ,3p~ :P),,··:, whether or n0t, tho r.:c;.;ipt w?-~:--vil.:i, .fogi1!3t0:r: _.Lxh.Pl, tH.ng.)m!ll~~er,i~l. I:am equally has-beii:.,l. :to cipl}ciu:-1.8,,h,elpqd. un,:iquivocall~r by the ·apJ?~113nt, 1 that ha also lil ccllJct 20,~03/50: · • : ~ ~:~:~, 1 · •· ·· Did the -~:)P\J, i:-r1:; st=J:=,l th.0 rr,'Jqey ,as .ch.:.1.cg::d. or l ..;:,£.=:r:t .. ' :thereof? •.. ·.. ilccord.-ingt to rimo·c.cJ.. Nr.usa, the.-appe..ll.a.11t ~:icp],.,3in8l the s-::,or_t_9_ga._~s._follows: . I • '1 1 C \)_·),]_:·-:ICCUSGl in-my .or'fic0 in F:.,b.1977, ,. . i ·'· . -- 3 ,-?. :;,d•, I }ont r.s::im :3';r'· ;_:.,.r ., : anJ° -~,e.· to 11 · mG he ·., ... : ·;. ~ .•(".' r. •. us-.,J. .r!Jl this rno:'.lc:y to cµ,1:J;ivat,=· hi's p3rs·cnal ,·::. ,_ :·. -~ ~ . ! ·:... • ' . . -~- .• ~- .. '.·.~ ·. ,! sb.::::;.-b8S•.'· But: w1:i'e'n· c·ross - ·exc·mirtiJ., by 't.i:w appellant t.fr<1''imotny 1J,glisa ,':~c·omEi's-iW \Ybvfn ·1h u:13':- . '. .. .- . . . .. .. . {) '. ' .: : : ,::_ ,;: .:. . ,_-, : •.. _, .·.. ,·: :: . "The 2C('.QS3d"·- liJ"'t<.:ill inc he' spent' this :r.•·~10•y < :=: ;,•";'.-''. ,; ,: . . to c'nl·~ iv:; t e. lii s sh31r. 09·s·•.. 1\ cc us3J. d. id s~X:6¼-J ;._;;·:;.;(''I. "'.,.,·) : ,..- <: t11e 2:'u~i.it,'.Jr, unautnor•is'3J. P.Vs, for Shs.·:,2860/td -;:::;· ··:.'~, hs'': .,•·:.· .. -t~; ~13vJ ·s,·c)nt, on.'h1s: snamb':l• _· · .. '-. ·. J:--:• · •. ...... I ;·l-.-~::-:yS.::.lf,..is.Je_"thu_s~-PVs_.n ... -. i , •·· ': -~ ... ~,:. . ,..... \._-,._... ~ ... /3. . ~ ",.. .. . • .3 Hsvins examin3l thu 2~ovj exc0r;ts, it is behoving to qu~stion Mr• Ngus!?,' s er Jiit, i1: .-1h::it h0 w,:;s t3stifying. I surmif'O inevitably, that if ti1e c1 ;:,•;:,8.U.?.n.t ;l:::t,; tolJ .Ngusa, tki t h:s h3., spon 1; :" 11 t11e money on p.;;rscnal sh:1mt.,:,_s 1 th::m, th-:J pi2ce of 3vi-lGnc2. wi1ic> :i.s :1-:~1rsay, that the ap;J131J.3,::,_-;~ _;_l•'.'·.·. si!cwn PVs for Shs. 2860/=- to t1iG ~:i.lliitor, · as b8ing expenJj_tL,X";J 0n Sli3mbas, must dero:3:ste, from t.,.c, cr2.iit of Ngusa's t2stirn0n;y 1 ·clJ··t t~1-0 appelbut tGl,1 him ne h·;,:1 spent, all the money on pers,.rnal ,J: . ,'.mbas• I cannot im·~e;ine, how the nppellant would hav9 s3 il sn 1 k:iving sh,)wn the PVs for Shs. 2860/=, to the Internal 1iuditcr. FU1·ther, if 1,1r. Ngusa, J.i:i net sJ-:: t.:-1.e PVs, and does n;,t Jeny tn,=;;; ,)Xist 1 and. t11cy were n:.t tenJec~:=l f.3 t,;ey should, 1• the comp0t:rnce cf · :i.s lnsr.:ection re;:,ort Cxh.P,4, is qucGtiona"ble. The appell~nt 7 on the oth8r hani, 1id testify th~t he spent 2860/= on ,.;ork3r s f,:·,2mba, snJ I that they subsequently w2.nteJ to refund the same• He alJ.0,.: 1 th,1t h-:i p1.:1 i:l thz bslecnc0, 0n lab,, ur0rs working on motor venicle tr~nsJorting cotton. Ha sail, th2t tje PVs for such paym-3nts, were ce2.::.1od by the lnternal ,1uiitor, ,-.no ,Jj_.t iVit incluJe the same in his .ce: __'•>rt if:x.p5. As I pointeJ earlier,_ in cr.,ncurrence with th-3 .itepublic 1 t:,(;; omission to ·call the Internal lim:itor, as a witn6ss seems t~ ~o 0f sabotajing effect. Aithout tiis internal auJitor, it is impossibl,➔ to challenge th0 appell::mt, t~H~t,no such payment vouch.:l.rs U(,;:·e c,::as.:d by him• rlith0ut any '.)f -che ;.;nrkers, or 1 labour·.;rs, it i.s ,1,,·c ce.sy to safely co~1clude, thJ.t n•.) f.H'.Ch payments were effectel oy t:.:.o 2.['1,elbnt, nor can you safcly im1:.1.1t<'! thievish elements upon the 2::_1pellant 3nl co - workers, in usin:; tl1e 2860/= on their communal cotton sh:mba intenling to return the scrne 1 where the prosparity of cotton inlustry demanJoi a workers Jo~0nstration •. Over anl 0jovo the afocegone, an examination.of t~8 charge sheet .:Jl1ows 1 th9.t t'..:2 d-)t2s for charged. theft, were bcdao0n 2nd .August 1975 and 9/1/1976e And yet, the amount ca1arg;;;(L r~n&;e from 2/8/1975 up to 28/2/76 - rlacaipt Nos r-39965 - 88 3n.:i 041501 - 041522 receipts 041505 - 0.11522 coming after the charg2l i~tas. This would mGan convicting "iil10 r:ppelhnt for amounts unchar.g:.d 7 -'.:!n :-:ispect that is extr2mely irrJ~TJ.."r nnd prejudicial. To conclu.l,,, -crlis CJS3 w:is obvici;sly rnishanllo.:l.; misinvestigatad, so much so, th3t ~tis difficult to coma to a conclusion, th3t the case ·,-.as proved b=!"/\):1C'. re-"!scn.3ble J.oubto In th-3 ev8nt, t;.iis appeal must be allow,=1 1 c,,nvictic•n qu".lsh:,d an:i sentence set 2sicl8. The appellant to be r.:.<1.0,'.' s,•J;..l, unless otherwise leg3lly h :;ld. DelivorJi ttis 31st iay of October, 1977. M\rlANZA-. •