mohamed salum nahdi vs elizabeth jeremiah 2017 tzca 338 8 june 2017

The applicant failed to account for an 18-day period of delay and did not provide reasonable cause for the entire delay; therefore, the application for extension of time is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: mohamed salum nahdi vs elizabeth jeremiah 2017 tzca 338 8 june 2017
Parties: Applicant: Mohamed Salum Nahdi; Respondent: Elizabeth Jeremiah
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 8 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome: Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Ex Parte Judgment, Delay in Filing
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Ex Parte Judgment Delay in Filing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mohamed Salum Nahdi

Applicant

Elizabeth Jeremiah

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file notice of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for an 18-day period of delay and did not provide reasonable cause for the entire delay; therefore, the application for extension of time is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

Application for extension of time is dismissed
Applicant to pay costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.