el nekheily v oau communication 12 of 1988 1988 achpr 10 26 october 1988
The communication is inadmissible because the OAU is not a State or Party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
- Citation
- el nekheily v oau communication 12 of 1988 1988 achpr 10 26 october 1988
- Parties
- Applicant: Mohammed El-Nekheily; Respondent: OAU
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Communication / Admissibility
- Outcome
- communication inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Dismissal, Non Payment of Salaries, Admissibility of Communication
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mohammed El-Nekheily
Applicant
OAU
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a communication against the OAU is admissible under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The communication is inadmissible because the OAU is not a State or Party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
Court Disposition
communication inadmissible
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment