monica mjungu vs leonard kisharuli and others 2021 tzhclandd 602 15 september 2021

monica mjungu vs leonard kisharuli and others 2021 tzhclandd 602 15 september 2021

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay; alleged illness not sufficiently evidenced; claimed illegality not apparent on the face of the record and requires long-drawn argument; legal threshold for extension of time not met.

Citation
monica mjungu vs leonard kisharuli and others 2021 tzhclandd 602 15 september 2021
Parties
Applicant: Monica Mjungu; 1st Respondent: Leonard G. Kishaluli; 2nd Respondent: Anuar R. Kishaluli; 3rd Respondent: Ashura S. Singano; 4th Respondent: Samwel Karunde; 5th Respondent: Aysha A. Kapela; 6th Respondent: Alfan S. Mahadhi; 7th Respondent: Goliath Mbembela; 8th Respondent: Simon Andrea; 9th Respondent: Bibi Mahimbo; 10th Respondent: Yusto N. Mkumbi; 11th Respondent: Joseph E. Msi
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
15 September 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Delay Due to Illness
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monica Mjungu

Applicant

Leonard G. Kishaluli

1st Respondent

Anuar R. Kishaluli

2nd Respondent

Ashura S. Singano

3rd Respondent

Samwel Karunde

4th Respondent

Aysha A. Kapela

5th Respondent

Alfan S. Mahadhi

6th Respondent

Goliath Mbembela

7th Respondent

Simon Andrea

8th Respondent

Bibi Mahimbo

9th Respondent

Yusto N. Mkumbi

10th Respondent

Joseph E. Msi

11th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether sufficient grounds exist to grant extension of time to appeal
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in tribunal's judgment constitutes sufficient cause
  3. 3 Whether illness constitutes good cause for delay

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay; alleged illness not sufficiently evidenced; claimed illegality not apparent on the face of the record and requires long-drawn argument; legal threshold for extension of time not met.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • No extension of time granted