Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHCCOMD

morgan air seafreight logistics kenya ltd vs serengeti fresh ltd 2022 tzhccomd 138 24 may 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court is satisfied that the deed of settlement is lawful and fully settles the suit; accordingly, the court records the settlement and passes a consent decree in terms of the agreement.

Court disposition

suit settled by consent judgment

Orders

  • Deed of Settlement registered and forms part of the consent judgment and decree

02

Material facts

Parties

Morgan Air & Seafreight Logistics Kenya Limited

Plaintiff Counsel: Hassan Ruhwanya

Serengeti Fresh Limited

Defendant Counsel: Benson Mhango

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Amount Claimed: USD 126,438
  • Interest Rate Claimed: 21

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Commercial Suit / Consent Judgment After Settlement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiff sought payment of USD 126,438, interest at 21% per annum, and costs, but parties reached a settlement before further hearing.
Respondent
Defendant, through counsel, agreed to the settlement and jointly filed the deed of settlement with the plaintiff.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R.E. 2019]

    Where a suit is adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise, the court shall order such agreement to be recorded and pass a decree in accordance therewith.

  2. 02

    Mulla, Code of Civil Procedure Act of 1908 (14th edition), page 1828

    A consent decree is not appealable and ends the suit once the agreement is recorded by the court.

  3. 03

    Motor Vessel Sepideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others Civil Application No 237 of 2013 CAT DSM

    Where there is lawful agreement or compromise, the court is bound to record a settlement once it is arrived at by the parties.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court is satisfied that the deed of settlement is lawful and fully settles the suit; accordingly, the court records the settlement and passes a consent decree in terms of the agreement.

Court disposition

suit settled by consent judgment

  • Deed of Settlement registered and forms part of the consent judgment and decree

Source and reliance status

TZHCCOMD · 24 May 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHCCOMD

Judgment· 24 May 2022

morgan air seafreight logistics kenya ltd vs serengeti fresh ltd 2022 tzhccomd 138 24 may 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)

AT ARUSHA COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 10 OF 2021

BETWEEN MORGAN AIR & SEAFREIGHT LOGISTICS KENYA LIMITED............................................. . PLAINTIFF

VERSUS SERENGETI FRESH LIMITED ...................................... DEFENDANT Date of Last order: 23/05/2022 Date ofJudgement: 24/05/2022

CONSENT JUDGEMENT MAGOIGA, J. The plaintiff, MORGAN AIR &SEAFREIGHT LOGISTICS KENYA LIMITED by way of plaint, instituted the instant suit against the above-named defendant praying for judgement and decree in the following orders, namely:- a) For an order for payment of outstanding amount of USD. 126,438/- (say United State Dollars One Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Eight) by the defendant; i b) For an order for payment of interest of 21% per annum on the outstanding amount mentioned in (a) above from the date the amount became due to the date of full payment of the said sums; c) Costs of this suit be borne by the defendant; d) Any other relief this Honorable Court may deems fit and just to grant. When this suit was called on for further hearing on 20th May, 2022, Mr. Hassan Ruhwanya, learned advocate for the plaintiff and Mr. Benson Mhango, learned advocate for the defendant informed the court that, they managed to settle the matter and prayed for time to prepare and have the deed of settlement filed in court on 24th May, 2022. Indeed, the deed of settlement dully executed by parties has already filed in this court today 24th May, 2022. I have gone through the Deed of Settlement filed in this court by the parties and indeed filed under order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R. E. 2019]. The said Rule 3 provides that: "Where it is proved to the

satisfaction of the court that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful 2 agreement or compromise or where the defendant satisfies the plaintiff in respect of the whole or any part of the subject matter of the suit, the court shall order such agreement, compromise or satisfaction to be recorded and shall pass decree in accordance therewith so far it relates to the suit." As the above provision provides, once a Deed of Settlement is entered and filed in court, the court must be satisfied that it is a lawful Deed and it does, indeed, adjust the suit either wholly or partially and, thereafter the court shall record it, thereby passing a decree in accordance therewith, and in so far it relates to the suit. The scope of Rule 3 of Order XXIII of the Civil Procedure Code, [Cap 33 R.E. 2019] was succinctly defined by Mulla, the Code of Civil Procedure Act of 1908 (14th edition) on page 1828, who stated as here below:- "The rule gives a mandate to the court to record a lawful adjustment or compromise and pass a decree in terms of such compromise or adjustment. Such a consent decree is 3 not appealable ... when the agreement relates to whole suit, the court on being invited by the parties, record the agreement and pass a decree in accordance with the agreement and the suits ends there." This position was acknowledged by the Court of Appeal in the case of Motor Vessel

Sepideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others Civil application No 237 of 2013 CAT DSM (unreported) where the Court citing Mulla on Code of Civil Procedure Act of 1908 observed that: "Where there is lawful agreement or compromise the court is bound to record a settlement once it is arrived at by the parties" I have examined the Deed of Settlement which seeks to settle the whole suit once and for all. I am satisfied as to its lawfulness and effect of settling the whole suit once and for all. In view of the above, the same is hereby registered and it shall form part and parcel of this consent decision of the court as well as its decree. 4 The present suit, therefore, by a deed of settlement dully executed by the parties in this case and filed in this court, this court hereby record this suit to be settled out of court in the terms and conditions as agreed in the Deed of Settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code filed in this court on 24th day of May, 2022. It is so ordered. Dated at Dar es Salaam on this 24th May, 2022. 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Motor Vessel Sepideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others Civil Application No 237 of 2013 CAT DSM

Case cited

Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R.E. 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.