sikudhani abdallah mshana another vs bank of africa tanzania limited 2021 tzhc 2781 26 february 2021

sikudhani abdallah mshana another vs bank of africa tanzania limited 2021 tzhc 2781 26 february 2021

The plaintiffs failed to prove lack of spousal consent or forgery. The properties were registered in the names of the mortgagors, not as matrimonial homes, and no registered interest of the 1st plaintiff existed. The bank followed legal procedures for mortgage and sale after default. The suit is without merit and dismissed against the 1st defendant.

Citation
sikudhani abdallah mshana another vs bank of africa tanzania limited 2021 tzhc 2781 26 february 2021
Parties
1st Plaintiff: Sikudhani Abdallah Mshana; 2nd Plaintiff: Hassan Hussein Hassan; 1st Defendant: Bank of Africa Tanzania Limited; 2nd Defendant: Abdallah Iddi Mshana
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
Suit dismissed against the 1st defendant; judgment entered against the 2nd defendant with costs.
Legal Topics
Mortgage Validity, Spousal Consent, Matrimonial Property, Fraud Allegations, Sale of Mortgaged Property, Burden of Proof
Source Language
English
Land Law Banking Law Family Law Mortgage Validity Spousal Consent Matrimonial Property Fraud Allegations Sale of Mortgaged Property +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sikudhani Abdallah Mshana

1st Plaintiff

Hassan Hussein Hassan

2nd Plaintiff

Bank of Africa Tanzania Limited

1st Defendant

Abdallah Iddi Mshana

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the mortgage of the four houses was legal
  2. 2 Whether the sale of the mortgaged properties was legal
  3. 3 What reliefs are available

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs failed to prove lack of spousal consent or forgery. The properties were registered in the names of the mortgagors, not as matrimonial homes, and no registered interest of the 1st plaintiff existed. The bank followed legal procedures for mortgage and sale after default. The suit is without merit and dismissed against the 1st defendant.

Court Disposition

Suit dismissed against the 1st defendant; judgment entered against the 2nd defendant with costs.

Orders

  • Suit dismissed against Bank of Africa Tanzania Limited (1st defendant)
  • Judgment entered against Abdallah Iddi Mshana (2nd defendant) under Order VIII Rule 14(2)(b) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 RE 2002