CIVIL APPLICATION NO 682 02 OF 2024 MOSES MOLLEL VS PASCHAL ARUSHA

CIVIL APPLICATION NO 682 02 OF 2024 MOSES MOLLEL VS PASCHAL ARUSHA

The application for stay of execution is misconceived because the High Court's decree in Land Appeal No. 12890 of 2024 is non-executable and does not grant any enforceable rights; therefore, there is nothing to stay under rule 11 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.

Citation
CIVIL APPLICATION NO 682 02 OF 2024 MOSES MOLLEL VS PASCHAL ARUSHA
Parties
Applicant: Mosses M Ollel; Respondent: Paschal Arusha
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeals, Execution of Decrees
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mosses M Ollel

Applicant

Paschal Arusha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the decree/order of the High Court in Land Appeal No. 12890 of 2024 is executable and capable of being stayed under rule 11 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay of execution is properly before the court

Ratio Decidendi

The application for stay of execution is misconceived because the High Court's decree in Land Appeal No. 12890 of 2024 is non-executable and does not grant any enforceable rights; therefore, there is nothing to stay under rule 11 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is struck out with costs