mr baldev norataram varma 2 others vs mr robert scheltens another 2004 tzhccomd 65 7 september 2004

mr baldev norataram varma 2 others vs mr robert scheltens another 2004 tzhccomd 65 7 september 2004

The agreement contains a binding arbitration clause, the petition for stay was filed before any step was taken in the proceedings, and the petitioners expressed readiness for arbitration. There is no sufficient reason not to stay proceedings; thus, the court orders a stay pending arbitration.

Citation
mr baldev norataram varma 2 others vs mr robert scheltens another 2004 tzhccomd 65 7 september 2004
Parties
Plaintiff: Mr. Baldev Norataram Varma; Plaintiff: Mr. Vikas Varma; Plaintiff: National Furnishers Limited; Defendant: Mr. Robert Scheltens; Defendant: Mr. David Ryan Scholz
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Petition for Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration
Outcome
Proceedings stayed pending reference to arbitration
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Clause Enforcement, Breach of Contract, Jurisdictional Objections
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. Baldev Norataram Varma

Plaintiff

Mr. Vikas Varma

Plaintiff

National Furnishers Limited

Plaintiff

Mr. Robert Scheltens

Defendant

Mr. David Ryan Scholz

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Petition for Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration

  1. 1 Whether proceedings should be stayed pending reference to arbitration under the agreement's arbitration clause
  2. 2 Whether the petition for stay was properly filed before entering appearance

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement contains a binding arbitration clause, the petition for stay was filed before any step was taken in the proceedings, and the petitioners expressed readiness for arbitration. There is no sufficient reason not to stay proceedings; thus, the court orders a stay pending arbitration.

Court Disposition

Proceedings stayed pending reference to arbitration

Orders

  • The proceedings are stayed pending reference to arbitration.