Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

MISC

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant's delay in filing the appeal was due to circumstances beyond his control, including prison transfer and administrative issues, and considering the severity of the sentence and the constitutional right of appeal, sufficient grounds exist to grant extension of time.

Court disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant granted thirty (30) days from the date of ruling to file notice of intention to appeal and petition of appeal
  • Right of appeal explained

02

Material facts

Parties

Mrisho Hodari Kenya

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Ms. Gladness Mchami

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence for Each Count: 30
  • Time Granted to File Appeal (days): 30

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant was convicted and sentenced to thirty years imprisonment on two counts. He lodged a notice of appeal through prison administration but was transferred to another prison before receiving proceedings and judgment. He received the documents later and lodged the petition of appeal, but it was not admitted in the system and the time to appeal had lapsed, necessitating this application.
Respondent
The respondent, through Ms. Gladness Mchami, agreed with the applicant's affidavit and did not contest the application.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Regional Manager, Tanroads Kagera vs. Ruaha Concrete Co. Ltd, Civil Application No. 96 of 2007, CAT at Dar Es Salaam

    There is no hard and fast rule as to what constitutes a good cause for grant of extension of time; the grounds should be considered in light of all circumstances of each case.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant's delay in filing the appeal was due to circumstances beyond his control, including prison transfer and administrative issues, and considering the severity of the sentence and the constitutional right of appeal, sufficient grounds exist to grant extension of time.

Obiter and limits

  • The severity of the sentence and the constitutional right of appeal are important considerations in applications for extension of time.

Court disposition

Application allowed

  • Applicant granted thirty (30) days from the date of ruling to file notice of intention to appeal and petition of appeal
  • Right of appeal explained

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 1 January 2025

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 1 January 2025

MISC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA DAR ES SALAAM SUB-REGISTRY

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2706 OF 2025 (Originating from the judgment of District Court of Bagamoyo in Criminal Case No. 237 of 2022)

BETWEEN MRISHO HODARI KENYA…………………………………………………... APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC……………………………………………………………...RESPONDENT

RULING Date of last order: 18/02/2025 Date of ruling: 18/02/2025 A.A. MBAGWA J. This is an application for the extension of time within which to file an appeal against the conviction entered, and sentence imposed by the trial District Court of Bagamoyo. The applicant has moved the Court by way of chamber summons in terms of the provisions of Section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The applicant prays for the following orders: 1 1. That this Court may be pleased to grant leave for extension of time within which the applicant may file an appeal out of time.

2. Any other relief(s) that this Court deems fit and equitable to grant. The application is backed up by the affidavit sworn by the applicant. It is deposed that the applicant was tried and convicted of rape contrary to Sections 130(1)(2)(e) and 131(1) of the Penal Code, and impregnating a school girl contrary to Section 60A of the Education Act by the trial Court in Criminal Case No. 237 of 2022. Consequently, he was sentenced to thirty (30) years imprisonment for each count. The judgment was delivered on 7th November 2023. The applicant was not amused by both conviction and sentences hence on 9th November 2023 lodged a notice of appeal through Prison administration of Ubena. However, before he was supplied with the copies of proceedings and judgment, on 20th November 2023 he was transferred to Ukonga prison hence a predicament to pursue his appeal. The applicant further states that while at Ukonga prison, he was on 12th July 2024 availed with the copies of the proceedings and judgment. As such, on 25th July 2024 he lodged the petition of appeal through prison administration. 2 Nonetheless, to his dismay, after frequent follow-ups on his appeal, he was notified that the appeal was not successfully admitted in the system. As bad luck would have, by the time he was informed of unsuccessful admission of his appeal, the prescribed time for lodging an appeal had lapsed. He thus had

no other option than to bring this application. When the matter was called on, the applicant appeared in person whilst the respondent Republic was represented by Ms. Gladness Mchami, learned Senior State Attorney. Ms. Mchami, at the outset, informed the Court that she had gone through the applicant’s affidavit and she was at one with the applicant. She clarified that it was for this reason, the respondent did not file a counter affidavit to contest the application. On my part, I have scanned the applicant’s affidavit together with the accompanying documents. I have glanced on the notice of appeal which the applicant allegedly lodged with administration of Ubena Prison. The same is dated 8th November 2023. However, there is no proof that the same was submitted to prison administration and later lodged in Court. Nonetheless, 3 considering the severity of the sentence the applicant is serving and alive to the underpinned constitutional right of appeal, I am convinced that the applicant has sufficient grounds to warrant extension of time. In the case of Regional Manager, Tanroads Kagera vs. Ruaha Concrete Co. Ltd, Civil Application No. 96 of 2007, CAT at Dar Es Salaam, it was held that there is no hard and fast rule as to what constitutes a good cause for grant of extension of time but rather the grounds should be looked at by considering all the obtaining circumstances in each

particular case. In this case, I am satisfied that the applicant’s delay in filing the appeal was caused by sufficient grounds. It is against this backdrop I am inclined that the application is meritorious and for that reason I allow it. The applicant is therefore given thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling to file a notice of intention to appeal and petition of appeal. It is so ordered. The right of appeal is explained. 4 Dated at Dar es Salaam this 18th day of February 2025. A.A. Mbagwa

JUDGE 18/02/2025 Court: The ruling has been delivered in the presence of Ms. Gladness Mchami, learned Senior State Attorney for the Republic, and the applicant this 18th day of February 2025. A.A. Mbagwa

JUDGE 18/02/2025 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Regional Manager, Tanroads Kagera vs. Ruaha Concrete Co. Ltd, Civil Application No. 96 of 2007, CAT at Dar Es Salaam

Case cited

Section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Sections 130(1)(2)(e) and 131(1) of the Penal Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 60A of the Education Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.