mrsbertha s mgombelo and another vs beatrice h umbe andanother 2020 tzhclandd 3927 16 december 2020
- Citation
- mrsbertha s mgombelo and another vs beatrice h umbe andanother 2020 tzhclandd 3927 16 december 2020
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 16 December 2020
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application to Correct Clerical Errors
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 16 December 2020
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application to Correct Clerical Errors
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the identified errors were indeed clerical and supported by the record, and therefore granted the application to correct them in the judgment and decree.
Court disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- The names of the 3rd and 4th defendants are corrected to Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgombelo.
- The second plaintiff, Honesta H. Umbe, is to be reflected as the 2nd plaintiff and not as the 2nd defendant.
- The case number is corrected to Land Case No. 87/2012 instead of Land Case No. 87/2013.
- Clerical errors to be rectified in the judgment and decree accordingly.
02
Material facts
Parties
Mrs. Bertha S. Mgombelo
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Stephen ShollaMr. Henry R. Mgombelo
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Stephen ShollaBeatrice H. Umbe
RespondentHonesta H. Umbe
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application to Correct Clerical Errors
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether clerical errors exist in the judgment and decree of Land Case No. 87 of 2013
- 02
Whether the court should correct the identified clerical errors
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants, through their advocate, argued that there are clerical errors in the judgment and decree of Land Case No. 87 of 2013, specifically regarding the year of the case, misidentification of parties, and incorrect names, and requested the court to correct these errors.
- Respondent
- The respondents did not appear and the matter proceeded ex-parte due to failed service.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Sections 95 and 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019
Court has inherent power to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees, or orders.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the identified errors were indeed clerical and supported by the record, and therefore granted the application to correct them in the judgment and decree.
Court disposition
Application allowed
- The names of the 3rd and 4th defendants are corrected to Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgombelo.
- The second plaintiff, Honesta H. Umbe, is to be reflected as the 2nd plaintiff and not as the 2nd defendant.
- The case number is corrected to Land Case No. 87/2012 instead of Land Case No. 87/2013.
- Clerical errors to be rectified in the judgment and decree accordingly.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 16 December 2020
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 16 December 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. LAND CASE APPLICATION NO, 393 OF 2020 MRS.BERTHA S. MGOMBELO..............................1st APPLICANT MR. HENRY R. MGOMBELO................................ 2nd APPLICANT
VERSUS BEATRICE H. UMBE............................. 1st RESPONDENT HONESTA H. UMBE...........................................2nd RESPONDENT
RULING S.M. MAGHIMBI, J: This application is brought under the provisions of Sections 95 and 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019 (The CPC"). The applicants are praying for this court to correct clerical errors depicted in the judgment and decree emanating from Land Case No. 87 of 2013 and any other relief(s) that this court may deem fit and just to grant. During the hearing of this application, the applicant was represented by Mr. Stephen Sholla, Advocate. This application proceeded ex-parte of the respondents following Mr. Sholla's prayer on reason that they could not trace the respondent. Having in the records the proof of failed service to the respondent and given the nature of the application, the hearing of this application proceeded ex-parte. In his submissions to support the application, Mr. Sholla first prayed that the contents of his affidavit be adopted to form part of his submissions. He then submitted that the orders sought in chamber summons is to i correct clerical errors repeated in the judgment and decree in Land Case No.87 of 2013. He prayed that this this application is granted. Having gone through the contents of the affidavit in support of this application as sworn by Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo, I have noted that the clerical errors pointed out by the applicant include the year of the case which should read 2012 and not 2013 which is actually so
on the records. There is further error whereby the 2nd plaintiff is depicted as the 2nd defendant and that the 1st and 2nd defendants names of Bertha Stella Henry Mgomelo and Henry Mgomelo were not correct. I have gone through the records including the plaint and the Written Statement of Defence and it is correct that proper names of the 1st and 2nd defendants were and should read as Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Henry Robert Mgombelo. Having satisfied myself of the clerical errors so features in the judgment and decree of this court in the Land Case No. 87/2013, I allow this application and the following clerical errors are hereby corrected: 1. The name of the 3rd and 4th defendants should read as Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgombelo instead of the current Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgomelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgomelo 2. The second plaintiff Honesta H. Umbe should be reflected as the 2nd plaintiff and not the current 2nd defendant.
3. The case number should read Land Case No. 87/2012 instead of the current Land Case No. 87/2013. 2 The said clerical errors should be rectified in the judgment and decree of this court in the Land Case No. 87/2012 and reflected as above corrected. It is so ordered. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 16th day of December, 2020. 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.