Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

mrsbertha s mgombelo and another vs beatrice h umbe andanother 2020 tzhclandd 3927 16 december 2020

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the identified errors were indeed clerical and supported by the record, and therefore granted the application to correct them in the judgment and decree.

Court disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • The names of the 3rd and 4th defendants are corrected to Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgombelo.
  • The second plaintiff, Honesta H. Umbe, is to be reflected as the 2nd plaintiff and not as the 2nd defendant.
  • The case number is corrected to Land Case No. 87/2012 instead of Land Case No. 87/2013.
  • Clerical errors to be rectified in the judgment and decree accordingly.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mrs. Bertha S. Mgombelo

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Stephen Sholla

Mr. Henry R. Mgombelo

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Stephen Sholla

Beatrice H. Umbe

Respondent

Honesta H. Umbe

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application to Correct Clerical Errors

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants, through their advocate, argued that there are clerical errors in the judgment and decree of Land Case No. 87 of 2013, specifically regarding the year of the case, misidentification of parties, and incorrect names, and requested the court to correct these errors.
Respondent
The respondents did not appear and the matter proceeded ex-parte due to failed service.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Sections 95 and 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

    Court has inherent power to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees, or orders.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the identified errors were indeed clerical and supported by the record, and therefore granted the application to correct them in the judgment and decree.

Court disposition

Application allowed

  • The names of the 3rd and 4th defendants are corrected to Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgombelo.
  • The second plaintiff, Honesta H. Umbe, is to be reflected as the 2nd plaintiff and not as the 2nd defendant.
  • The case number is corrected to Land Case No. 87/2012 instead of Land Case No. 87/2013.
  • Clerical errors to be rectified in the judgment and decree accordingly.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 16 December 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 16 December 2020

mrsbertha s mgombelo and another vs beatrice h umbe andanother 2020 tzhclandd 3927 16 december 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. LAND CASE APPLICATION NO, 393 OF 2020 MRS.BERTHA S. MGOMBELO..............................1st APPLICANT MR. HENRY R. MGOMBELO................................ 2nd APPLICANT

VERSUS BEATRICE H. UMBE............................. 1st RESPONDENT HONESTA H. UMBE...........................................2nd RESPONDENT

RULING S.M. MAGHIMBI, J: This application is brought under the provisions of Sections 95 and 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019 (The CPC"). The applicants are praying for this court to correct clerical errors depicted in the judgment and decree emanating from Land Case No. 87 of 2013 and any other relief(s) that this court may deem fit and just to grant. During the hearing of this application, the applicant was represented by Mr. Stephen Sholla, Advocate. This application proceeded ex-parte of the respondents following Mr. Sholla's prayer on reason that they could not trace the respondent. Having in the records the proof of failed service to the respondent and given the nature of the application, the hearing of this application proceeded ex-parte. In his submissions to support the application, Mr. Sholla first prayed that the contents of his affidavit be adopted to form part of his submissions. He then submitted that the orders sought in chamber summons is to i correct clerical errors repeated in the judgment and decree in Land Case No.87 of 2013. He prayed that this this application is granted. Having gone through the contents of the affidavit in support of this application as sworn by Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo, I have noted that the clerical errors pointed out by the applicant include the year of the case which should read 2012 and not 2013 which is actually so

on the records. There is further error whereby the 2nd plaintiff is depicted as the 2nd defendant and that the 1st and 2nd defendants names of Bertha Stella Henry Mgomelo and Henry Mgomelo were not correct. I have gone through the records including the plaint and the Written Statement of Defence and it is correct that proper names of the 1st and 2nd defendants were and should read as Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Henry Robert Mgombelo. Having satisfied myself of the clerical errors so features in the judgment and decree of this court in the Land Case No. 87/2013, I allow this application and the following clerical errors are hereby corrected: 1. The name of the 3rd and 4th defendants should read as Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgombelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgombelo instead of the current Mrs. Bertha Stella Mgomelo and Mr. Henry Robert Mgomelo 2. The second plaintiff Honesta H. Umbe should be reflected as the 2nd plaintiff and not the current 2nd defendant.

3. The case number should read Land Case No. 87/2012 instead of the current Land Case No. 87/2013. 2 The said clerical errors should be rectified in the judgment and decree of this court in the Land Case No. 87/2012 and reflected as above corrected. It is so ordered. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 16th day of December, 2020. 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019, Sections 95 and 96

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.