19880913 TZHC Dar es Salaam

ViI3CELLl~1I::..tCU;J CIVIL Ci.U:JZ HO• 39 OF 1'98G V01"GUO RULING __ . _...,.... ~ ,. .-,,._-:.., ___ It 29pcc~ □ t~ct tho partioo in the inctsnt a~plicztion hcv0 proceeded upon the ~coting th□ t the r.r:..it hot,,reon the cpp1icc.nt Mro • :.CG:i."'i,1c,li c:nd the fd.rat :rec.po:ne:ent the Registrar of' Euilciingo in t:"J.,2) Regional Hou::dng Tribunal ao well no tl'3.e appeal tL12.t 1rn::: lodged to ·;;he ~:..Iousing Appeel:J Trihi..mGl by the Regiatrc.r of Buildingo were governed by the proviaions of the Rent Reatriction Act, 1984. It a o er.1.s ·1; o me tI--:iat thi □ is ~ correct epproc:ch •. EiGo 3::yono. ,-::t~1e· second reopen.dent ::.-1G:r.ein, uc:is undoubtedly r:,:.~ ir-.. tor0at0d p8rty in the 21oov0 p:L"'occ0din.;-o •· 3he ~12.0 occupying tI::0 .suit premioes c.:t ·;;i.,.e m2tcTial time end t~.1.e dcciclio:n of the :-Iouoing Appec.la Trihl..1nc1l cdv0~00ly affected ~er interests. party ·bo the p::-occedingo cind ohe U8G r::.ot lleecrd t;_,.rou- Mi □ o B □ yonc 2ade 2n ex-perte &p~lic~tion on 1C/6/B8 of the decree grsntad to the ap~licant, ponding t~e ~ he2ring cr:d cfoter,,ii;:ic: tion of' an oppee:l by the Regis tra.r o:f 3uildingn f'ror.1 the decioion of ·the Ffoucing Appe;:1lG Tribun2,J.. 'l'hc t applicc. tion wo.s "heard by the lec,rncd granted the c.pplicstion and r:1ad0 an orce1..~ in tllcoe termc: • .In view o:i: th~ f'[.\Ct that the RegiGtre1r · o:f

BuildingG h2.a filed c.n o::_:;,peal to this court 2gainot the decioion of the RouGing Apper~ls Tribunal i t is unci.er -the circu1:11Jtc1- ~ceo of the cc.Ge fair and juot to ord0r otcy of execution of the decree pending determaim:: tion of'- the cppecl by tltlo Court• It is so ordered"• - 2 Eowever, i t is "i;:t'l..i0 ·l:;I::.Bt at ·che time of heEiring 10.cs B2.yona 1 n h2.d not given,-· any notice o:f ~ppeal. Tl:,erc wBG, as i t were, the ,:1ere ,-rord of' Mio a B2,yona the. t the Regic trar hnrbou:"'ed t:i:20 intention of' lodging 2.n c1ppeal cgninct the decision of' the Aypoalo Tribunal. I have heard the advoc2- tes • Hr, M2,rando who appeared £'or J\'.iio::; B8.yo:.1.2: ~id 110:t scco to like to eddress hi::10.01:f cq_ucu•ely to the centrc.1 iooue in thio 2..p::_)11.c;:.i t:i.on, 11.2:1:iely w!c.ether t::i.ere are pointc o-Z la,-, iuvo_lve<l in ·~he r1atter. 1Jo·✓1 leJ.:: 1 0 fcce it, i t iG overly clear f'1.~or1 what I h& v0 pointed 2l bov3 the. t the order oi' the JI{ rd.se::3 poi:c.ta o:; l2w the. t e □ino:ntly c01:1c::0nd the nppliccnt I o in·cend.ed cippc2.l to hearing by tho Court of Appcol •. According~y, I cra:n:b thio 1.:,pplic2, t:i.on, ce:;:-tj_:,:ice ·00 -..,r...e intended cppec"\l and f'orr.::u.12-cc t7.~e poi:;:rc::i ?:f law involved ao :follc·(·fc: wns •Draper I fo~ the J,K. l to 3ayona 1 o application ~or stay of executio:n without nccordi-ng !{r::i.

Kcrr:mli an· oppo:..~tuni ty of' being hecrd againat it, 2. ··:Lb.ether under tl"J.e Civil Procedure Code the JK h~d. poi-,er jco grz.nt Nis G B2yonc: 's npplico tion in the term::; he did when the Regiotrar of Buildings h..;,cl not given nny notice of: oppenl; .ic J. ~E~etl:o:...., ( ~nd to r:1e "Ghio/the r.10et interesting poi11t) in the acher:ie 2.nd intendmont of' t~J.e Rent Re □ triction Act, 1984, in particular o~ction l.i-3(1) t:1G.rcof, the High Court wao prohibited from The coots of thio Ct:,?plicatio:n ohull follow the event 2,nd 2.re to be borne by ltlioG B2.yon2i. · Delivered I"1r. I~cc2.:i...,ic. :for the Applicant