ms ardhi university vs ms kiundo enterprises t ltd 2023 tzhccomd 332 11 september 2023

ms ardhi university vs ms kiundo enterprises t ltd 2023 tzhccomd 332 11 september 2023

The applicant demonstrated diligence in pursuing the appeal, the delay was technical and not due to negligence, and the interests of justice warrant extension of time. The application is meritorious and allowed.

Citation
ms ardhi university vs ms kiundo enterprises t ltd 2023 tzhccomd 332 11 september 2023
Parties
Applicant: M/S Ardhi University; Respondent: M/S Kiundo Enterprises (T) Limited
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Right of Appeal, Registration of Arbitral Award, Technical Delay, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M/S Ardhi University

Applicant

M/S Kiundo Enterprises (T) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for extension of time to file a notice of appeal against the ruling in Misc. Commercial Application No. 272 of 2015

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated diligence in pursuing the appeal, the delay was technical and not due to negligence, and the interests of justice warrant extension of time. The application is meritorious and allowed.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant granted thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling to file notice of appeal against the ruling and order in Misc. Commercial Application No. 272 of 2017
  • Each party to bear its own costs