19901130 TZCA Mwanza2
The appellant was clearly and outrightly negligent in failing to provide adequate warning of the road diversion, and there was no basis for apportioning liability to the respondent's driver. The special damages awarded were reasonable and properly proved. The award for non-user of the vehicle was reasonable and not arbitrary.
- Citation
- 19901130 TZCA Mwanza2
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S G.S.L.E. s.p.a.; Respondent: Hamoud Said
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed in part
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Damages, Motor Vehicle Accident
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S G.S.L.E. s.p.a.
Appellant
Hamoud Said
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was solely negligent for the accident
- 2 Whether contributory negligence should be apportioned to the respondent's driver
- 3 Whether special damages were strictly proved
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was clearly and outrightly negligent in failing to provide adequate warning of the road diversion, and there was no basis for apportioning liability to the respondent's driver. The special damages awarded were reasonable and properly proved. The award for non-user of the vehicle was reasonable and not arbitrary.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed in part
Orders
- Appeal dismissed except for the deduction of TZS 18,000 for funeral expenses from the award.
- Respondent to have costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment