ms tender international co ltd vs ruth simumba 4 others 2022 tzhcld 678 25 july 2022

ms tender international co ltd vs ruth simumba 4 others 2022 tzhcld 678 25 july 2022

The applicant failed to account for each day of delay and demonstrated negligence; no sufficient cause for extension of time was shown; the alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
ms tender international co ltd vs ruth simumba 4 others 2022 tzhcld 678 25 july 2022
Parties
Applicant: M/S Tender International Co. Ltd; Respondent: Ruth Simumba; Respondent: Fredrick Robert Mtui; Respondent: Zawadi Simchimba; Respondent: Obadia Ibrahim; Respondent: Haruna Yusuph
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
25 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Labour Revision, Unlawful Termination, Procedural Delay
Source Language
english
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Labour Revision Unlawful Termination Procedural Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M/S Tender International Co. Ltd

Applicant

Ruth Simumba

Respondent

Fredrick Robert Mtui

Respondent

Zawadi Simchimba

Respondent

Obadia Ibrahim

Respondent

Haruna Yusuph

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file a labour revision
  2. 2 Whether the delay was due to technical reasons or negligence
  3. 3 Whether alleged illegality is apparent on the face of the record

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for each day of delay and demonstrated negligence; no sufficient cause for extension of time was shown; the alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs