msengele msilu peter vs selous safari company 2022 tzhc 13801 5 september 2022

The applicant failed to demonstrate good cause for extension of time as he did not provide evidence that the initial application was filed within the prescribed period, nor did he act diligently or promptly in prosecuting subsequent applications. Negligence in filing incompetent applications cannot be excused as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: msengele msilu peter vs selous safari company 2022 tzhc 13801 5 september 2022
Parties: Applicant: Msengele Msilu Peter; Respondent: Selous Safari Company
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 5 September 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitration Award, Technical Delay, Good Cause Requirement
Source Language: english

Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision of Arbitration Award Technical Delay Good Cause Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Msengele Msilu Peter

Applicant

Selous Safari Company

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant demonstrated good cause for extension of time to file a revision application against the CMA award
2 Whether technical delay was established by the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Each party to bear its own costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.