19911011 TZHC Tabora
The doctrine of recent possession applied as the stolen items were found in the appellants' possession within three days of the theft, and the explanations given by the appellants were not credible. The trial magistrate was entitled to reject the appellants' denial of knowledge and to convict based on the evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19911011 TZHC Tabora
- Parties
- Appellant: Musoni Andrew & Swotibu; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed, convictions and sentences upheld
- Legal Topics
- Burglary, Theft, Receiving Stolen Property, Recent Possession Doctrine
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Musoni Andrew & Swotibu
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the convictions for receiving stolen property were proper
- 2 Whether the sentences imposed were justified
Ratio Decidendi
The doctrine of recent possession applied as the stolen items were found in the appellants' possession within three days of the theft, and the explanations given by the appellants were not credible. The trial magistrate was entitled to reject the appellants' denial of knowledge and to convict based on the evidence.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed, convictions and sentences upheld
Orders
- Convictions upheld
- Sentences affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
~ c__ \ ) \.::) \,) <.::-, <'.A..f\ IN TEE IIIGH COURT OF ~UJZ.U1IA AT T1\.BORA --- i\.PPELiii.TE JURISDICTION / (Tabora llegist:i:y) ( I-IC ) c:l.BIIlJ,:\L AP~:&\L 'J'TO O 61 cf 62 OF 1988 01ua:o:::.11 U~ill1I'.:L\.L C.\.SE NO. 34 OF 1988 OF TIO DIST:J.ICT COU-.::1T OF Hmd<I. DIST:a.ICT AT NZEG.\ Befo1"'0: P.Oo .\l:TG'1JLO Esq., ... o . . . . . . . . . . o u • • DISTRICT H'i.GISTR.\.TE MUSOJ'i\. ..i:NDBEW & s'..WOTIBiL • o • • " • • • • • o • • • • ., • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ..:\PPBLL.WT 40riginal ~\.ccused) Versus Tlw IlE::uTIL IC 0 • 0 • 0 .0 0 0 0 ., t> 0 0 0 0 • b Cl O OO O • 0 • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • ]]JS I'Olilllli'fT ,, ( ori.2,"i :t1al l?ros0out or) J U D G E M :S ~T T !,_O:lOSSO 2 Jo The two app0als Eos. 61/88 and. · 62/88 have been lodged by the 1st ..\.ppella:o.t and 2nd :..l.ppellant rospecti vei;f, arrl they have been consoli.datod ard will be oonsidexed aln detorrninod collectively as they spriri..g fl.~om one criminal case lToo 34/88. Bcfo::-c t;:ie District' Court of Nzega, tho ..:'.. ppellants tog0.tb.or with a third _',.ccuso d, om Hamad. Maga11.s21 vTO:i.'O jointly charged with two offences. In the 1st 001:mt j they wore jointly cb.arG9d ui th tho offonco of bure;la:ry c/ s 294 ( 1) of tho Fonal Code. In tho 2nd cotmt, tllcy wore jointly charged with tho offonoo of stoalL"l,.J" o/s 265 of tho Penal Code. Tho 31-d ...i.oou.scd, Hamnd Maga::.1.ga, was oonvictod. on both counts on ~.lis o,;m plea of gvil ty to tho charge • " Tho 1st ~'l.ppollant a:rn:l. 2na. j:ppollant 1ror-o found guilty and convicted 0111. tho \ ai-tcrfla:t;i VD offonco of rccoj_ving stolon ::?roporty bo1iovi11g tao saE10 to have boon stolon or 1..111lawfully obtained c/~ 311 of tho Pon.al Codo. They wc1"'0 each sonto:1cod to 3 yoa:,.'S in;:t.)risornno:i;it. Tho;y arc challongizig tho propriety Gf their convictions aY1Cl sonto11cos. Mx, J3ilaro, tho J.o;..,1"21od State ~'i.ttor:(1oy stro11gly sur,::,ortod. tl:o co11•riotions 1'0gistofod a 6ai:nst t:.10 .,:ippollants. ' Those appoc;ls n:co devoid of mc1'"'i t • Tho 3rd Acousod was convicted on hj_s oi-;r.:.1 ploa of gu.:Ll t;f to tho two offo,1cos of bLJ.rglod a11dft ..:ir,JJ~;:, ; on tb.c ni:'.iht of 16/3/88. On 19/3/88, tho houses of., tho 3:ro. :~ccusod and tho ~l:ppolla::.1ts i;roro soo..:ro!.iod and a variety of items found m-il..... seized. in their houses wo:;.:0 dully ido:c:.tifiod by tho complain:mt 1 ono Ru!d.a ~/o }tyombo (PW1). Tho 31-d .Accused 011 his 1)Q,rt identified t:J.o i toms fo1i:1d ', c:,acl soizod f.rom the possossio,1S of tl10 .'i.pr,ollants a.s havi:-.1g l)oon amongst tho .g;oods he had stolon f:;_,om tho house of tho oom:c,Liinant. !Tho 1st .lppolln.nt ncl..mi ttod that ho ha.d. obt:1incd fxom tho 3n:.l ..\.ccusod the soizod goods 9 howovor ho totally d.iscl[',imod lQ.1owlode;-o of tho. goods lmving .Peon stolon pro1:x:;rt~r• I, Tho loa.n.1.od trial Ma..:,"j_ptrnto rojccto:3. tho 1st ~l.i)l/Oll~i,nt' s luck of l.:20wlod.go bocauso itorns lil::o 2 cus;:.ious 9 ono safa;:d c"':.ish, ono :pln..stic reni:c1 4 too. caps o.rrl 3 cups wore :bm:cl conooalod. in the coili:'13 Cr.r: up-~'•Or- fl00r. - --'l'ho learned trial ?.I::i,:sistro,to w2,s c:::.t:i.,tlod to come to that firil.:i.1,g of facts.. If 110 know / tho;r uo:co not stolen, tci0, cu)s and otl:or Hc,.1s did not ncod to lJc :1icldon. f' ! • 1l'ho so.me i toms l:i.kc ~- J'l.l[s, sporlg'C ii,C'.,tt:;;;'Qss and 2 i~odio spoa~wrs fo1.u1e1 in his l)Or,:Js_ose:d.on worn ido~1tifiod by botl:. tlie 21>tl .'i.cousocl and t:10 Comj1l.:i.i1:o.nt horsolf• (Pt-T1) as having bcon t1li10l"t;'St the stolon pro]X)rty. Tho ..lp1}ollc:.,nts' 1i';i."I'JU,.'lds of appeal a:ro morn I crocodile tears'. •·I Tllo la~;SO of t~1l"'OC days sL200 t~1.o de.to of tl10 incident onti tlocl tho loai·•ncc1 t:i."ial Magist1,;:,.tc to invo:.:o t:10 doct1":i.;10 of l"OCont posse::rnion. ConVictions urholcL arnl so:1tonc:::s to :i."CraJ.in micl:i.stu:i'.'1)od. , ..... ', / 0 r:-., ! ~ ! r·. l ,, ' /: , . · G. G• Tro~o~·~, 0 ,.J.o. o A. ,jj.:) ,1.\. 9 JUDOT:J 11/1°0/91 i'