mustapha kimaro vs mariam hamis maftaha 2022 tzhclandd 210 22 march 2022
The court is functus officio as it has already dismissed the previous appeal for being time-barred; the application for extension of time cannot be entertained.
- Citation
- mustapha kimaro vs mariam hamis maftaha 2022 tzhclandd 210 22 march 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Mustafa Kimaro; Respondent: Mariam Hamis Maftaha
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Res Judicata, Functus Officio
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mustafa Kimaro
Applicant
Mariam Hamis Maftaha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for extension of time is res judicata
- 2 Whether the court is functus officio to determine the application
Ratio Decidendi
The court is functus officio as it has already dismissed the previous appeal for being time-barred; the application for extension of time cannot be entertained.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment