mwamedi hamis sakis vs republic 2019 tzca 191 24 may 2019

mwamedi hamis sakis vs republic 2019 tzca 191 24 may 2019

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to establish, by affidavit evidence, any grounds under rule 66(1)(a)-(e) on which the intended review would be predicated, a mandatory requirement for extension of time.

Citation
mwamedi hamis sakis vs republic 2019 tzca 191 24 may 2019
Parties
Applicant: Mwamedi Hamis @ Sakis; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Appellate Judgment, Procedural Requirements
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Procedural Law Extension of Time Review of Appellate Judgment Procedural Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwamedi Hamis @ Sakis

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for delay in applying for review
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has established grounds under rule 66(1) for the intended review

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to establish, by affidavit evidence, any grounds under rule 66(1)(a)-(e) on which the intended review would be predicated, a mandatory requirement for extension of time.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • application for extension of time to apply for review is dismissed