kadili zahoro vs mwanahawa selemani 2020 tzca 1847 13 november 2020

kadili zahoro vs mwanahawa selemani 2020 tzca 1847 13 november 2020

Applicants failed to demonstrate any novel point of law or issue of general importance; their affidavit and notice of motion lacked substantive grounds for leave to appeal; application dismissed for insufficient material.

Citation
kadili zahoro vs mwanahawa selemani 2020 tzca 1847 13 november 2020
Parties
1st Applicant: Kadili Zahoro; 2nd Applicant: Sauda Bahati Mponda; Respondent: Mwanahawa Selemani
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kadili Zahoro

1st Applicant

Sauda Bahati Mponda

2nd Applicant

Mwanahawa Selemani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants demonstrated sufficient grounds for leave to appeal against the High Court's refusal to extend time
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal raises issues of law or general importance

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants failed to demonstrate any novel point of law or issue of general importance; their affidavit and notice of motion lacked substantive grounds for leave to appeal; application dismissed for insufficient material.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs