Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

MWANDU HINDISHI DEED OF SETTLEMENT

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the deed of settlement was mutually consented to by all parties and satisfied the requirements of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, warranting its adoption as the judgment and decree of the court.

Court disposition

suit settled by consent

Orders

  • The deed of settlement is recorded and adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.
  • The plaintiffs and defendants have agreed to settle the matter out of court.
  • Defendants publicly exonerated plaintiffs at a village meeting, declaring they are not witches and have not hindered village development.
  • Defendants shall not defame or isolate the plaintiffs again.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mwandu Hindishi

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Mshomari Isumbi

Nhumbu Hindishi

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Mshomari Isumbi

Dafuda Hindishi

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Mshomari Isumbi

Timbwi Shingo

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Mshomari Isumbi

Mayenga Kudeba

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Mshomari Isumbi

Masunga Kudeba

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Mshomari Isumbi

Kulwa Kudeba

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Mshomari Isumbi

Kingi Sita

Defendant Counsel: Mr. Majula Magembe

Nkinga William

Defendant Counsel: Mr. Majula Magembe

Madede Masule

Defendant Counsel: Mr. Majula Magembe

Amounts and remedies

  • Principal Sum Claimed as Compensation for Defamation: TZS 350,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Consent Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiffs sought compensation for defamation, general damages, and costs, and agreed to settle the matter out of court as per the deed of settlement.
Respondent
Defendants agreed to the terms of the deed of settlement, including public exoneration of plaintiffs and an undertaking not to defame or isolate them.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R.E. 2019]

    A suit may be settled wholly or in part by a lawful agreement or compromise, and such agreement shall be recorded by the court and form part of the decree.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the deed of settlement was mutually consented to by all parties and satisfied the requirements of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, warranting its adoption as the judgment and decree of the court.

Court disposition

suit settled by consent

  • The deed of settlement is recorded and adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.
  • The plaintiffs and defendants have agreed to settle the matter out of court.
  • Defendants publicly exonerated plaintiffs at a village meeting, declaring they are not witches and have not hindered village development.
  • Defendants shall not defame or isolate the plaintiffs again.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 8 November 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 8 November 2024

MWANDU HINDISHI DEED OF SETTLEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (IN THE SUB REGISTRY OF SHINYANGA)

AT SHINYANGA CIVIL CASE NO. 12964 OF 2024 MWANDU HINDISHI…............................................1ST PLAINTIFF NHUMBU HINDISHI………………………….………….2ND PLAINTIFF DAFUDA HINDISHI……………………….……………….3RD PLANTIFF TIMBWI SHINGO………………………………………….4TH PLAINTIFF MAYENGA KUDEBA……………………………………….5TH PLAINTIFF MASUNGA KUDEBA……………………………………….6TH PLAINTIFF KULWA KUDEBA….……………..……………………….7TH PLAINTIFF

VERSUS KINGI SITA…………………………………….…………1ST DEFENDANT NKINGA WILLIAM……………….............................2ND DEFENDANT MADEDE MASULE……………………………………….3RD DEFENDANT

CONSENT JUDGMENT 6th & 8th November, 2024 MASSAM, J: - This consent judgement emanates from deed of settlement dully signed by the Defendants and Plaintiff in this court on 5th November, 2024. The Plaintiffs instituted this suit against the above-named defendants praying for judgement and decree for following reliefs; - i. For the payment of the principal sum to a tune of Tshs 350,000,000/= as compensation for defamation. ii. The defendants be ordered to pay the plaintiffs general damages. 1 iii. Costs of this suit be paid by the defendants and iv. Any relief(s) this Honourable court may deem just and fit to grant. The plaintiffs were represented by Mr. Mshomari Isumbi Advocate while the defendants enjoyed the service of Mr. Majula Magembe learned counsel. On 6th November 2024 when the matter came for hearing parties informed the court that, by consent they had signed deed of settlement and prayed that this court to adopt the same as the decree of this court and mark this matter settled and proceed to issue consent judgment under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R.E. 2019]. I have dispassionately gone through the deed of settlement dated 5th November 2024 which signed by both parties in terms of under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code Cap. 33 RE 2019. I am satisfied that the same was mutually consented. In the view of the above the deed of settlement is hereby recorded and adopted to form part of consent judgment as prayed by the parties on the following orders: - 1. That, the plaintiffs and defendants have agreed to settle the matter out of the court.

2. That, the defendants have called the meeting on 4th November,2024 and cleared the plaintiffs through the Isebanda village meeting, and 2 have told all villagers that the plaintiffs are not witches and further to that are not using witchcrafts to hinder the development of Isebanda village including prohibiting fetching of water at the pond that is situated at the plaintiff’s land.

3. That, the defendants shall not defame the plaintiff again, and the defendants shall not make the plaintiffs be isolated by any means. By this consent decision, therefore, this court hereby declare that parties hereabove have resolved their dispute and this suit is marked settled on the compromise of the parties, as evidenced by the terms agreed under the said deed of settlement. For the reasons aforesaid the deed of settlement signed by the parties and filed in this court constitute the judgment and decree of this court. It is so ordered. DATED at SHINYANGA this 8th day of November, 2024. R. B. Massam

JUDGE 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R.E. 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.