20180607 TZCA Dar es Salaam2

20180607 TZCA Dar es Salaam2

The applicant demonstrated good cause for the delay by accounting for each period and showing diligence. She was not a party to the High Court proceedings, making revision the only available remedy. The delay was justified and not caused by dilatory conduct.

Citation
20180607 TZCA Dar es Salaam2
Parties
Applicant: Mwantumu Ndugumbi; Respondent: Venance Shirima
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Party Capacity, Delay Justification
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Party Capacity Delay Justification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwantumu Ndugumbi

Applicant

Venance Shirima

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to apply for revision
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was a party to the proceedings in the High Court and thus eligible to appeal or seek revision

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated good cause for the delay by accounting for each period and showing diligence. She was not a party to the High Court proceedings, making revision the only available remedy. The delay was justified and not caused by dilatory conduct.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant granted sixty (60) days from the date of the ruling to file application for revision