Misc

Misc

The delay was technical and not associated with negligence; the applicant acted expeditiously and provided sufficient reasons for the delay, including issues with the electronic filing system. The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
Misc
Parties
Applicant: Mwanzatangu Sudi Faraji; 1st Respondent: Dr. Sabbas Kim Bo Ka; 2nd Respondent: Mwita Maro @ Mwita Marwa Sai; 3rd Respondent: Gilbert John Kavishe; 4th Respondent: Lina Kejo; 5th Respondent: Michael Kejo
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Limitation of Actions, Electronic Filing
Source Language
english
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Limitation of Actions Electronic Filing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwanzatangu Sudi Faraji

Applicant

Dr. Sabbas Kim Bo Ka

1st Respondent

Mwita Maro @ Mwita Marwa Sai

2nd Respondent

Gilbert John Kavishe

3rd Respondent

Lina Kejo

4th Respondent

Michael Kejo

5th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal
  2. 2 Whether the delay was due to negligence or technical reasons

Ratio Decidendi

The delay was technical and not associated with negligence; the applicant acted expeditiously and provided sufficient reasons for the delay, including issues with the electronic filing system. The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant is given fourteen (14) days from the date of delivery of this ruling to file the intended appeal.
  • No order as to costs.