mwenda makusi fundogolo vs kidawa idd 2019 tzhc 169 19 december 2019
Applicant failed to provide credible evidence for delay; speculative and unsupported reasons do not warrant extension. Presence of submissions by both parties suffices for determination of appeal.
- Citation
- mwenda makusi fundogolo vs kidawa idd 2019 tzhc 169 19 december 2019
- Parties
- Appellant: Mwenda Makusi Fundogolo; Respondent: Kidawa Idd
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Probate
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mwenda Makusi Fundogolo
Appellant
Kidawa Idd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file rejoinder
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to provide credible evidence for delay; speculative and unsupported reasons do not warrant extension. Presence of submissions by both parties suffices for determination of appeal.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Appeal to be decided based on submissions already on record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment