nacky esther nyange vs msmariam marijani wilmore another 2021 tzca 345 2 august 2021

nacky esther nyange vs msmariam marijani wilmore another 2021 tzca 345 2 august 2021

Applicant met requirements under Rule 11(5)(a) and (b); substantial loss would occur if evicted, and a firm undertaking to execute a bond is sufficient security. Stay of execution is granted pending appeal.

Citation
nacky esther nyange vs msmariam marijani wilmore another 2021 tzca 345 2 august 2021
Parties
Applicant: Nacky Esther Nyange; 1st Respondent: Mrs. Mariam Marijani Wilmore; 2nd Respondent: Mihayo Marijani Wilmore
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
2 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Performance, Substantial Loss, Matrimonial Property
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nacky Esther Nyange

Applicant

Mrs. Mariam Marijani Wilmore

1st Respondent

Mihayo Marijani Wilmore

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if execution is not stayed
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has provided adequate security for performance of the decree

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant met requirements under Rule 11(5)(a) and (b); substantial loss would occur if evicted, and a firm undertaking to execute a bond is sufficient security. Stay of execution is granted pending appeal.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Stay of execution of High Court decree in Civil Case No. 155 of 2015 pending hearing and determination of Civil Appeal No. 207 of 2019
  • Applicant to execute a bond within 14 days of delivery of ruling