19701002 TZHC Dar es salaam
- Citation
- 19701002 TZHC Dar es salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 2 October 1970
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 2 October 1970
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Since the conviction for burglary and stealing was quashed, the accused had not breached the probation order, and the sentence of imprisonment for breach of probation was set aside.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Sentence of imprisonment for twelve months set aside
- Accused to be released forthwith if not otherwise lawfully detained
02
Material facts
Parties
[Name not specified]
AppellantThe Republic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Probation Period: 12
- Imprisonment Sentence Set Aside: months 12
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the accused breached the probation order based on a conviction that was later quashed
- 02
Whether the sentence of imprisonment for breach of probation was valid
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The accused had not breached the probation order as the conviction leading to the alleged breach was quashed.
- Respondent
- The respondent relied on the conviction by the Primary Court to assert breach of probation.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
General principles of criminal law and procedure
A sentence based on a conviction that is subsequently quashed cannot stand.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Since the conviction for burglary and stealing was quashed, the accused had not breached the probation order, and the sentence of imprisonment for breach of probation was set aside.
Obiter and limits
- There was a possibility that the two cases involved the same radio, but proceedings revealed they were separate and unrelated.
- The probation order was properly made and stands unaffected, though it has now expired.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed
- Sentence of imprisonment for twelve months set aside
- Accused to be released forthwith if not otherwise lawfully detained
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 2 October 1970
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 2 October 1970
IJ2- Judgmeat or Order on Appeal (s.
320) Criminal Form No. 33 (Approved by the High Court under Section 352 of the Criminal Procedure Code). Summary rejection (s.
317)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANTA
AT DAR ES SALAAM
APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL,No ... 46. ................ OF Original Criminal Csae No........ 85?. ............................ of 19.69 of the District Court of.1lr..e5..$a1fl ......... District ....................... before ..... t .11 .. .BwhB.Wa ..................Esq., Resident Magistrate/in,ietMagistrate. . Appellant (Original Accused) versus THE REPUBLIC .......................................................................................... Respondent (Original Prosecutor) cHARGE: Stealing by Agent c/s 275 (b) of the Penal Code. ) JUDGMENT/ORDER ZIRON, J. - The accused was charged on the 27th of May, 1969 in the Dar es Salaam District Court, with stealing as agent, a radio, He pleaded not guilty, and the hearing was adjourned. After a nuniber of adjournments, when the accused appeared in court on the 14th of August, 1969, he changed his plea to that of guilty, and he was convicted on his own plea. The facts were briefly, that the accused, an elderly radio repairer, was entrusted with a radio for repair, and he sold tt In breach of trust. The magistrate took Into consideration the accuseds good record, the niber of dependents on hIm and in the exercise of his discretion and I may add, mercy, he placed the accused on probat ton 0 P Dam 10224/12-65/60m/4up .12 -: for twelve months. On the 8th of January of this year, in the Kariakoo Primary Court, the accused
was convicted of burglary and stealing and he was sentenced to imprisonment respectively,for two years and three months, to run currently. He escaped the award of corporal punishment, as he was over-age. On this conviction by the Primary Court being reported to the Dar es Salaam District Court, that Court on the 2nd of February, 1970 having found that the accused had breached the probation order, sentenced him to imprisonment for twelve months. However, the conviction by the Primary Court of Kariakoo was quashed by the District Court Dar es Salaam on the 14th of February, 1970, and the sentences imposed on such convictions were set aside. As the convictions were quashed, the accused had not in fact breached the probation order. Tte sentence of imprisonment for twelve months imposed for the breach of such order., is accordingly set aside. In view of the fat that in both cases a radio was involved, there was the possibility that the two cases referred to the same radio and the case before the Primary Court constituted res judicata. Accordingly the proceedings before the Primary Court were called for, and these now to hand disclose that two cases were completely separate and unre1ated4 The probation order made on the 14th of August, 1969, was therefore properly made and stands unaffected, though incidentely, it is now expired. As the senteñce of imprisonment for twelve months imposed on the 2nd of February, this year has been set aside, the accusedif not otherwise lawfully detained in custody, is to be released forthwith. Delivered in Court of Dar es Saiaam this 2nd day of October, 1970. (PHILIP BIRON) JUDG1.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.