Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19701002 TZHC Dar es salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Since the conviction for burglary and stealing was quashed, the accused had not breached the probation order, and the sentence of imprisonment for breach of probation was set aside.

Court disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentence of imprisonment for twelve months set aside
  • Accused to be released forthwith if not otherwise lawfully detained

02

Material facts

Parties

[Name not specified]

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Probation Period: 12
  • Imprisonment Sentence Set Aside: months 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The accused had not breached the probation order as the conviction leading to the alleged breach was quashed.
Respondent
The respondent relied on the conviction by the Primary Court to assert breach of probation.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General principles of criminal law and procedure

    A sentence based on a conviction that is subsequently quashed cannot stand.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Since the conviction for burglary and stealing was quashed, the accused had not breached the probation order, and the sentence of imprisonment for breach of probation was set aside.

Obiter and limits

  • There was a possibility that the two cases involved the same radio, but proceedings revealed they were separate and unrelated.
  • The probation order was properly made and stands unaffected, though it has now expired.

Court disposition

Appeal allowed

  • Sentence of imprisonment for twelve months set aside
  • Accused to be released forthwith if not otherwise lawfully detained

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 2 October 1970

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 2 October 1970

19701002 TZHC Dar es salaam

IJ2- Judgmeat or Order on Appeal (s.

320) Criminal Form No. 33 (Approved by the High Court under Section 352 of the Criminal Procedure Code). Summary rejection (s.

317)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANTA

AT DAR ES SALAAM

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL,No ... 46. ................ OF Original Criminal Csae No........ 85?. ............................ of 19.69 of the District Court of.1lr..e5..$a1fl ......... District ....................... before ..... t .11 .. .BwhB.Wa ..................Esq., Resident Magistrate/in,ietMagistrate. . Appellant (Original Accused) versus THE REPUBLIC .......................................................................................... Respondent (Original Prosecutor) cHARGE: Stealing by Agent c/s 275 (b) of the Penal Code. ) JUDGMENT/ORDER ZIRON, J. - The accused was charged on the 27th of May, 1969 in the Dar es Salaam District Court, with stealing as agent, a radio, He pleaded not guilty, and the hearing was adjourned. After a nuniber of adjournments, when the accused appeared in court on the 14th of August, 1969, he changed his plea to that of guilty, and he was convicted on his own plea. The facts were briefly, that the accused, an elderly radio repairer, was entrusted with a radio for repair, and he sold tt In breach of trust. The magistrate took Into consideration the accuseds good record, the niber of dependents on hIm and in the exercise of his discretion and I may add, mercy, he placed the accused on probat ton 0 P Dam 10224/12-65/60m/4up .12 -: for twelve months. On the 8th of January of this year, in the Kariakoo Primary Court, the accused

was convicted of burglary and stealing and he was sentenced to imprisonment respectively,for two years and three months, to run currently. He escaped the award of corporal punishment, as he was over-age. On this conviction by the Primary Court being reported to the Dar es Salaam District Court, that Court on the 2nd of February, 1970 having found that the accused had breached the probation order, sentenced him to imprisonment for twelve months. However, the conviction by the Primary Court of Kariakoo was quashed by the District Court Dar es Salaam on the 14th of February, 1970, and the sentences imposed on such convictions were set aside. As the convictions were quashed, the accused had not in fact breached the probation order. Tte sentence of imprisonment for twelve months imposed for the breach of such order., is accordingly set aside. In view of the fat that in both cases a radio was involved, there was the possibility that the two cases referred to the same radio and the case before the Primary Court constituted res judicata. Accordingly the proceedings before the Primary Court were called for, and these now to hand disclose that two cases were completely separate and unre1ated4 The probation order made on the 14th of August, 1969, was therefore properly made and stands unaffected, though incidentely, it is now expired. As the senteñce of imprisonment for twelve months imposed on the 2nd of February, this year has been set aside, the accusedif not otherwise lawfully detained in custody, is to be released forthwith. Delivered in Court of Dar es Saiaam this 2nd day of October, 1970. (PHILIP BIRON) JUDG1.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Section 275(b) of the Penal Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 320 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 352 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.