20171020 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The 2nd respondent was not a party to the sale agreement and there was no concrete evidence of misrepresentation. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof required to establish liability for misrepresentation or entitlement to damages or reimbursement. The trial Magistrate properly assessed the evidence and applied the law.
- Citation
- 20171020 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: [Name Redacted]; 1st Respondent: [Name Redacted]; 2nd Respondent: [Name Redacted]
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Misrepresentation, Burden of Proof, Sale of Land, Damages, Evidence Assessment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[Name Redacted]
Appellant
[Name Redacted]
1st Respondent
[Name Redacted]
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd respondent was liable for misrepresentation in the sale of land to the appellant
- 2 Whether the trial Magistrate properly assessed the evidence and applied the law
- 3 Whether the appellant was entitled to damages or reimbursement
Ratio Decidendi
The 2nd respondent was not a party to the sale agreement and there was no concrete evidence of misrepresentation. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof required to establish liability for misrepresentation or entitlement to damages or reimbursement. The trial Magistrate properly assessed the evidence and applied the law.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs; each party to bear own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment