national bank of commerce limited vs tradex international limited others 2003 tzhc 102 17 december 2003

national bank of commerce limited vs tradex international limited others 2003 tzhc 102 17 december 2003

There was an overdraft agreement between the parties, the 1st defendant defaulted, and the principal outstanding is TZS 86,369,499 with interest at 26%. The plaintiff breached the agreement by altering terms and withholding documents, causing loss to the 1st defendant, who is entitled to compensation of TZS 44,400,000 with interest. The 1st defendant's entitlement is to be set off against the plaintiff's decree. If the balance remains unpaid, the plaintiff may sell the mortgaged properties sequentially to recover the balance.

Citation
national bank of commerce limited vs tradex international limited others 2003 tzhc 102 17 december 2003
Parties
Plaintiff: National Bank of Commerce Limited; 1st Defendant: Tradex International Limited; 2nd Defendant: Hussein Omari; 3rd Defendant: Salim A Hussein
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
17 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for both plaintiff and 1st defendant as elaborated in the judgment, with set-off of amounts awarded.
Legal Topics
Overdraft Facility, Mortgage Security, Breach of Contract, Damages, Set Off, Interest Rates
Source Language
English
Banking Law Contract Law Commercial Law Overdraft Facility Mortgage Security Breach of Contract Damages Set Off +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Bank of Commerce Limited

Plaintiff

Tradex International Limited

1st Defendant

Hussein Omari

2nd Defendant

Salim A Hussein

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was an overdraft agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants and its terms
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach by the 1st defendant of the overdraft agreement
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff breached the overdraft agreement and caused loss to the 1st defendant

Ratio Decidendi

There was an overdraft agreement between the parties, the 1st defendant defaulted, and the principal outstanding is TZS 86,369,499 with interest at 26%. The plaintiff breached the agreement by altering terms and withholding documents, causing loss to the 1st defendant, who is entitled to compensation of TZS 44,400,000 with interest. The 1st defendant's entitlement is to be set off against the plaintiff's decree. If the balance remains unpaid, the plaintiff may sell the mortgaged properties sequentially to recover the balance.

Court Disposition

Judgment for both plaintiff and 1st defendant as elaborated in the judgment, with set-off of amounts awarded.

Orders

  • 1st defendant to pay TZS 86,369,499 plus interest at 26% per annum to plaintiff, or mortgaged properties to be sold sequentially to recover the balance.
  • Plaintiff to pay 1st defendant TZS 44,400,000 as compensation for loss, with interest at 26% per annum from 18 January 2000 to judgment, then at 12% per annum until full satisfaction.