NBC LTD VS JOMO KENYATTA TRADERS LTD COMM CASE NO
Since the defendants' application to defend was struck out as incompetent, the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment as per Order XXXV rule 2 (2) (a) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- NBC LTD VS JOMO KENYATTA TRADERS LTD COMM CASE NO
- Parties
- Plaintiff: National Bank of Commerce Limited; Defendant: Jomo Kenyatta Traders Limited; Defendant: Moi Kashigo Kivaria; Defendant: Michael Kimwaga; Defendant: William Geoflrey Kimwaga; Defendant: Monica Kimwaga; Defendant: Mwanaidi Salum Bushir
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Loan Recovery, Civil Procedure Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Bank of Commerce Limited
Plaintiff
Jomo Kenyatta Traders Limited
Defendant
Moi Kashigo Kivaria
Defendant
Michael Kimwaga
Defendant
William Geoflrey Kimwaga
Defendant
Monica Kimwaga
Defendant
Mwanaidi Salum Bushir
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment under Order XXXV rule 2 (2) (a) of the Civil Procedure Code after the defendants' application for leave to defend was struck out
Ratio Decidendi
Since the defendants' application to defend was struck out as incompetent, the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment as per Order XXXV rule 2 (2) (a) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff with costs.
Orders
- Defendants to pay Tsh. 1,032,610,099.21 being the outstanding amount as at December 31, 2014.
- Interest at the contractual rate from December 31, 2014 to the date of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) AT PAR ES SALAAM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 64 OF 2015 NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED.........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOMO KENYATTA TRADERS LIMITED' MOI KASHIGO KIVARIA MICHAEL KIMWAGA WILLIAM GEOFLREY KIMWAGA I........................... DEFENDANTS MONICA KIMWAGA MWANAIDI SALUM BUSHIR 28th & 29th October, 2015 SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Under Order XXXV rule 2 (2) (a) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 of the Revised Edition, 2002) MWAMBEGELE, J.: After the application for leave to defend this summary suit was struck out on 28.10.2015 for being incompetent, Mr. Linda Bosco, the learned counsel for the plaintiff who appeared for the plaintiff prayed that summary judgment be entered in favour of the plaint. The prayer was made under Order XXXV rule 2 (2) (a) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 of the Revised Edition, 2002. 1 Ms. Bosco, learned counsel is right to present the prayer. Since the defendants' application to defend the summary suit as required by the law has been struck out, then the provisions of Order XXXV rule 2 (2) (a) of the CPC must be brought into play. As was articulated in CRDB Bank Limited Vs John Kagimbo Lwambagaza [2002] TLR 117, the purpose of "Order XXXV: Summary Procedure" is to enable a plaintiff to obtain Judgment expeditiously where the defendant has in effect no substantial defence to the suit. The allegations by the plaintiff Bank in the plaint are therefore adjudged to be admitted and the Bank is entitled to Judgment. In the premises, I do hereby enter judgment for the plaintiff Bank as prayed in the first limb of the prayers plaint with costs. That is to say; (a) Payment of the sum of Tanzania Shillings One Billion Thirty Two Million Six hundred Ten thousand ninety and Cent Twenty one (Tsh. 1,032,610,099/21) being the total outstanding amount on account of the Multi Option Facility Commercial Terms and the Term Loan Commercial Terms granted to the 1st Defendant as at December 31, 2014; (b) Interest on the above at the contractual rate from December 31, 2014 to be the date of judgment; (c) Interest on the decretal amount at the rate of 7% from the date of judgment to the date of full and final payment; and (d) Costs of the suit to be borne by the Defendants. 2 The alternative prayers in the plaint will have to be pursued under relevant circumstances and avenue according to the law upon failure by the defendants to pay the outstanding amount. Order accordingly. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 29th day of O • / ya J. C. M. MWAMBEGEL JUDGE 3