20090603 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Leave is granted as there is no objection from the respondents and the application is supported by affidavit evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 20090603 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Respondent: National Insurance Corporation of Tanzania Ltd; Respondent: Parastatal Sector Reform Commission
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 3 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Institute Suit / Ruling on Application for Leave
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Sue Public Corporation, Procedure for Instituting Suit, Costs of Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Insurance Corporation of Tanzania Ltd
Respondent
Parastatal Sector Reform Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Institute Suit / Ruling on Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to institute a suit against the respondents, a specified public corporation and a commission
Ratio Decidendi
Leave is granted as there is no objection from the respondents and the application is supported by affidavit evidence.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Leave granted to the applicant to institute legal proceedings against the respondents.
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
·.r:· .11··.-· ' . ' AT DAR·Es SALAAM· Date of Las~ Order 08/06/2009i .,t.,,(;,;_J:Ul~.'I'.~( Date of Ruling 03/06/2006 · ,, · ':-;, ::·•," RULING_ :t:' i:~ ;~ -1 :~~. t~ fiil-;1}.:\li.>· .\; . 1• MWARIJA,J. ,_pf..:iLlC:'ATIOl~ ·,.;, ·.. ·, . . . : ·.·· ·>::~i: ~:.,.:·:-\t)r~ This is an applicatiop :fot\il~ave to institute a suit against the . . : } :'•' ~tr(" . ~ :. "{,!,! ~:( I re'spondents; the National Insurapce Corporation of Tanzania Ltd, a ! specified public corporation· ar;(~~f)'{fi~ Parastatal Sector Reform ::., :\·: r·:,,: ··)t1~~- :' ' . \tiir· ! Commission. The applicatio17-_:i~\~Ro.~~n- brought under S. 9 (1) of . ·/;: --i j-~·'.A·}< . . the Bankruptcy [Act Cap. 25 RE.2002], 8.43 of the Public ·~·1n~• ·n: t ·. .: , . ~ · ,,,,,;,J;I\;<,, .>. ,II,, . ,, .. 4 . . ,._ .. ,. ' ; ~- . . Corporations Act, [Cap. 257. ~E.2002] and S.95 of· the Civil •·• ll<•'· . ..... .!ti. ii·"'"·. ''\,"i ·,. • ' ll"• -f€0 L ·' ( 1 , , ,r;1~} ,: • ~\1• >•! ·'. d. deponed to the. effect that he• t~r~;: f~!Il ,against the 1st .respond~nt arising out of an accident ·Which ,)i,n,volved the applicant's motor t~,~>~-+J'\I()~. .·.\ . vehicle insured of by the said ;:ts{::resp;btident. Since his claim could · . i . :. ) · ,/~::~. ·--:: . ·l; not be settled, he intents t9,,YI~i~:'~w'.kih the court o'r law. ;'f[·.f}"? , •,,1.f.fft,, · :;1.nu: The 1st respondent PfloifUlJQ~ted by Mr Victor, learned J -~ /2 \'\\l'i"A""n~}'!:' :':) r~.- _,.t. J counsel while the 2 nd res~~i~-t lt•was represented by Ms. Shiyo, ;,; ·25 .. • learned counsel. Both leatnea• ~~u£.fsel did not have any objection to- the application .. _-; 1,' i ~~~~t ,!_~ ;~\. } ·:.t ~:) '.. .·,\ Having considered tlie_ ~PPH5~\~qn J~Specially the supporting • ' • . . ·. •!. •., 1; ~ ~ affidavit s'worn by the app~~\~¥ there has been no l'ibjection . .;- _: ..-y) 7{~:-~ ~J .; :. )( by the respondent, I hereby gfttri.t le~¥~ to the applicant to institute •. ,' _.;,:.J\,.:.-,.~:.t· his intended legal proceed~~itrl~;,J:osts of this application is awarded to the applicant. .,_,,!·~-l;.' •· cr.pp1te"1_···:·~u.Y,:\·~(-. ·--t~ .. r: 4 .. slr. :~ija JUDGE 2 l • -~-- :• ~ ." • :>:.~./~j •.,~ C i J' . J~tt\ -~t~-tt'+ ', '~i,;'.J ,,._ CC: Yasintha Ruling delivered JUDGE -~ 1. ?;;}'\\ F~;J':};_';_t\:t ·,y.<!i'- ~ • ,,, • :· -~ .! ~· ~ .~ . '•t'"' ,••· -·· ~;so'."?! ~ ;.?·.)· \ ' .. 3 rf\.l;;·•G.i ·. ~)ri·: :.r\1r~f1