20031029 TZHC Arusha
There was no sufficient material to fault the concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts, which found the respondent's case more credible, especially as his witnesses were from the relevant village. The appellate court's judgment was adequately analytical and complied with procedural requirements.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 20031029 TZHC Arusha
- Parties
- Appellant: Nderingo Sangito; Respondent: Tadayo Ndewario
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Land Ownership, Inheritance, Credibility of Witnesses, Appellate Review, Judgment Writing Requirements
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nderingo Sangito
Appellant
Tadayo Ndewario
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower courts erred in finding the respondent as the lawful owner of the disputed land
- 2 Whether the appellate court relied on hearsay evidence and ignored other evidence
- 3 Whether long occupation by the appellant conferred ownership
Ratio Decidendi
There was no sufficient material to fault the concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts, which found the respondent's case more credible, especially as his witnesses were from the relevant village. The appellate court's judgment was adequately analytical and complied with procedural requirements.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment