MISCELLANEOUS LAND APPLICATION NO

MISCELLANEOUS LAND APPLICATION NO

The applicant's delay of six days in filing the appeal was caused by the late supply of the ruling, which constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time.

Citation
MISCELLANEOUS LAND APPLICATION NO
Parties
Applicant: Neema Shigela; 1st Respondent: George Marwa Maswe; 2nd Respondent: Haruna Ally Msagula (also known as Matenganya Ally Msagula as administrator of the estate of Hyana Abdallah Milandi)
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Sufficient Cause for Delay
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Sufficient Cause for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neema Shigela

Applicant

George Marwa Maswe

1st Respondent

Haruna Ally Msagula (also known as Matenganya Ally Msagula as administrator of the estate of Hyana Abdallah Milandi)

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's delay of six days in filing the appeal was caused by the late supply of the ruling, which constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant granted fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling to file her appeal
  • Costs to follow the event