Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

ngosha manghu john vs republic 2023 tzhc 20451 28 august 2023

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Attempted murder is not among the offences for which bail is restricted under section 148(5)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act; therefore, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to conditions.

Court disposition

Bail granted subject to conditions

Orders

  • Applicant to execute a bond of Tshs. 2,000,000/= with two reliable sureties each in the like sum.
  • Sureties to produce introductory letters from their respective Village leaders affixed with current passport size photos.
  • Applicant to report to the OCD of respective area once a week pending trial.
  • Sureties to be approved by the presiding magistrate of the case.

02

Material facts

Parties

Ng'osha s/o Manghu @ John

Applicant

Republic

Respondent Counsel: Atupelye Makoga and David Mwakibolwa

Amounts and remedies

  • Bail Bond Amount Per Person: TZS 2,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Pending Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that attempted murder is a bailable offence, that he has reliable sureties, and that bail is a constitutional right.
Respondent
The respondent supported the application, confirmed the offence is bailable under section 148 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and requested the court to set bail conditions to ensure the applicant's appearance.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, Article 13(6)(a)

    Bail is a fundamental right of an accused person unless specifically restricted by law.

  2. 02

    Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 R.E. 2022

    Section 148(5)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act restricts bail for certain offences, but not for attempted murder.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Attempted murder is not among the offences for which bail is restricted under section 148(5)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act; therefore, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to conditions.

Obiter and limits

  • The court noted that the respondent's counsel incorrectly cited Article 13(3)(b) of the Constitution instead of Article 13(6)(a) regarding the right to bail.

Court disposition

Bail granted subject to conditions

  • Applicant to execute a bond of Tshs. 2,000,000/= with two reliable sureties each in the like sum.
  • Sureties to produce introductory letters from their respective Village leaders affixed with current passport size photos.
  • Applicant to report to the OCD of respective area once a week pending trial.
  • Sureties to be approved by the presiding magistrate of the case.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 28 August 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 28 August 2023

ngosha manghu john vs republic 2023 tzhc 20451 28 august 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (SUMBAWANGA DISTRICT REGISTRY)

AT SUMBAWANGA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2023 (Originated from the District Court of Sumbawanga at Sumbawanga in PI Attempted Murder Case No. 3 of2023) NG'OSHA s/o MANGHU@ JOHN ........................................ APPLICANT

VERSUS REPUBLIC.................... RESPONDENT

RULING 24l: August & 28 August, 2023 T ; MRISHA, J. This is an application: for bail pending trial of attempted murder in PI Case No. 03 of 2023 by the District Court of Sumbawanga at Sumbawanga (the trial court). The application has been filed by the applicant one Ng'osha Manghu @John, under section 148(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 R.E. 2019[now 2022]; hence the present application. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant himself. It provides the brief background of the applicant's case as well as the reasons for the instant application. i When the matter was called for hearing, the applicant appeared in person, unrepresented whereas the respondent Republic was represented by Atupelye Makoga and David Mwakibolwa, both learned State Attorneys. The applicant threw the ball to this court by praying to it to consider his application and grant him bail pending trial and determination of his criminal as at the lower court. Through his respective affidavit, the applicant has deponed that he was L v.'_•<?.. ” <•' <4 k • v.'.A'a ? ?r’ charged with the offence of Attempted Murder in PI Case No. 03 of 2023 at the District Court of Sumbawanga at Sumbawanga. That, the said offence is one of the bailable offences, the right which is guaranteed by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, 1977 as amended from time to time. He has also

deponed that, he is an ordinarily farmer who resides at Kalakala Village within Sumbawanga District, Rukwa Region and that he has reliable sureties who have their permanent abodes in Rukwa Region; they will stand for his bail. The respondent Republic neither filed a counter affidavit nor contested the present application. Ms. Atupelye Makuga, learned State Attorney 2 contended that the offence the applicant stands charged with is bailable under provisions of section 148 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 R.E, 2022. In addition, she submitted that bail is a constitutional right under Article 13(3)(b) of the United Republic Constitution of 1977 (as amended). Finally, she urged this court to set bail conditions which will cause the applicant to appear before the trial court without fail. ' '' It is not disputed in this application that the offence of attempted murder is bailable. In his application -the applicant has told this court that he is charged with the offence of attempted murder in PI case No. 3 of 2023, which is bailable and he has reliable sureties. On the other side, the respondent Republic has supported the application and went far by praying to this court to grant and set bail conditions which will give an assurance that the applicant appears before the trial court without fail. Since the applicant's application has not been opposed by the respondent Republic, it

is obvious that they have no problem with the applicant's prayer provided he meets the bail conditions to be set by this court, The 3 issue here is whether an offence of attempted murder which is contrary to section 211(a) of the Penal Code, Cap 16 R.E. 2022 is bailable. I agree with the respondents counsel that bail is a fundamental right of an accused person which is guaranteed under the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. However, I have noted that the learned counsel has cited the provisions of Article 13(3)(b) of the said Constitution to support that position, but with due respect to her, I think she might have missed the point because that Article does hot provide for such right. I think the proper provision ought to be Article 13(6)(a) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania which provides that: "To ensure equality before the law, the state authority shall make procedures which are appropriate or which take into account the following principles, namely: (a) when the rights and duties of any person are being determined by the court or any other agency, that person shall be entitled to a fair hearing and to the right of appeal or other legal remedy against the decision of the court or of the other agency concerned" [Emphasis added/ 4 That apart, section 148 of the CPA has provided some restrictions to the police and the courts of law from

granting bail to accused persons charged with serious offence. Such restriction is provided under section 148(5)(a) of the CPA which provides that: "(5) /4 police officer in charge of a police station ora court before whom an accused person is brought or appears, shall not admit that person to bail if- (a) that person is charged with- (i) murder,treason, armed robbery, or defilement..." From the above provisions of the law, it is .apparent that an offence of attempted murder the applicant herein stands charged with is not among the offence under which bail is restricted. That, by necessary implication implies, that such offence is bailable just like other criminal offences. It follows therefore, that since the applicant's prayer for bail has not been opposed by the adverse party and the offence of attempted murder is bailable under the provisions of section 148, CPA, I am persuaded that the applicant has assigned sufficient reasons for him to 5 be granted bail. Hence, basing on the reasons stated reasons, I grant him bail subject to the following conditions: - 1. He shall be released on bail upon executing a bond in the tune of Tshs. 2,000,000/= with two reliable sureties each in the like sum.

2. Sureties to produce in the trial court introductory letters from their respective Village leaders affixed with their pictures (current passport sizes).

3. Accused to report to the OCD of respective area once a week pending trial and determination of his case.

4. Sureties to be approved by the presiding magistrate of the case. Order accordingly.

JUDGE 28.08.2023 DATED at SUMBAWANGA this 28th Day of 2023. 6

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 R.E. 2022

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, 1977 (as amended)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code, Cap 16 R.E. 2022

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.