19881010 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The conviction was upheld based on credible identification by complainants who knew the appellant, corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of incriminating items. The sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the offence and injuries sustained.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19881010 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Ngwelngwara Majiburu; Respondent: The United Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Identification Evidence, Sentencing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ngwelngwara Majiburu
Appellant
The United Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the identification of the appellant was reliable
- 2 Whether the conviction for robbery with violence was justified
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was upheld based on credible identification by complainants who knew the appellant, corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of incriminating items. The sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the offence and injuries sustained.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
1.h Tm :rran: c o-u.J.ir OF '.l_ £uTJ;;.;u1. 1 AT D~Ul ES SL.Ll~fJI APPELL.\TE Jlffiif:;;DICTION illGII COURT CRirmr!:..L ;.:?:;:;LI., no O 124 OF 1987 OF 11'L..C DISTRICT COURT OF Rufiji DISTRICT l.T Uto·i;o J3oforo Ntuiy 9 Esqo, Distric·~ £·Ic,eiotr0,te "I NGWJJW1ELA J'.1 • l,TICCil'IBJ.RU o o •• ; • "~ «" o. , , •., •• " ...., • • • • e • • • • Ii.PP:CLLJJJT ( vri 6 ino,l Lca-..1rlcc1) versus (TIIE ·m.JITED IlZ?lTI3LIC •• ~ ~ 0 . 0 9 . 0 0 . b 3 0 0 0 ~ti~:,,(' 0 0 '),., 0 0 eRES:?OI:TJ)Ei\f11 0 I) 0 CO ( O1·:i.ginal ProsoCl.l_for) JUDGEt!ElY:: The a-ppellci.nt 9 Ngwe.1.1gwara ?.fo].12,r::od J':2M:i.bDrU, was convicted liy tho distric·c Court of Rufiji clistrict Court; at Utofo of robbery wi"'Gh violonco, roi.d ho we,G sentenced to oic;ht yoa.r:J ioprisonrnont.. I.Io is G.ppec11ing 2..gainat tho convictio;.1 and :::icntcnco. Evidence ua.s givc,n by PH1 ;:I.2.l1J.j~:. Seif and P 6 W.2 Linero Taib 9 who ic ~.adija'o husbn.1.1c1. 9 "0:.1at on tho nic;h-c of 19 -tpri1 9 1986 whilG in 'their ho1.,1:Jc 9 ·c!::'.:i;;r hoard a b;:::ng on tJ.,.o door 9 and tho cloo:;:, uo,a iJrokcn 6 The appolla.nt forcibJ;:,- Off;;'JJ:' f. tho roor:i hoh'...inc a. torch and a pnngo.,o I:o slanhocl PW1 Tindijo. on tho o.rn r'J.:c. 0::.1 <;>) chest., The cl,:'.)poll8ll~G n.lso cut PW2 LL-101·0 with the JXU1(S:'.'.o Both wi tncoscs r.;1,,_r;·:;::,,inc( c1:1-~ woulc.ls. Tho ·witncssco wore c.ble -to iclo;1tif'y tho n.:_1pollc.J.'l~.; boco.usc of -:;:\o ·light. of tl:o ~och. Tho appcll,mt is 2, rol::-,tivo .of PW1 I~c..clija,. T;-ic wi·~:1G~:i:1c:-: ,:vc:1 •- appellant hc:1,Cl injured thon 9 ho stole the lJic:yclo and ru11 3:wny., Noighbo-u.J..'s arr·ivrr• and they :founc.l -~:.ic appellant hnd dise,ppco.rcd4 Tho na·b-tor wc.s reported to Police· t>o following Dorningt Tho appol~.::-.a-t ~;:,' nrrostcd nnd hiG house wns scarchod4 ~'. pr-;1go.. o..nd c. bloocl-stcined shirt ·Fo1·c 1·0·- covorcd in t11G c,ppcllo.nt' s roon., TJ·_c cor.1plo.i;1.ants wore ·i;ro:;,-i;o0. in tho >.ospi·:;:·.:J. f·or tho injuries they had sust2,inocl. r.rho nodical ropo:::ts show thc.t bot:-: >.:'A.::. c-~1·;; woulds~ OJ.1cl 0110 of tho wmmds .._s dosc1•ibcd as dnn 6 orous., Tho appollm'lt c.:.c:-1:L-:-cL tho ch2.rgc ooyi~1G' ·t'.1at ho wc.s nrrc::rcocl on auspocion only., Ee agrood thee ·c: ;c pc'Jlg:::i. wao soizocl froo his house d1.,1.rinc scnrch o.nd. t:.cat the Police his shirt o.11 oe;ing it wn.s b loocl st0inGclc I t~:ink, o,s t~10 trb.l migistrr,-cc properly diroctod. ;.:is nind 9 tho n,,:i.:.:. question ' hero is on tho id01:itific2.tio11 of ·tho 0,ppoll::-.nt rw t:1.0. two .ritno:::;;.:;, :-.1,. Thore wao ~10 c1j_zputo thc,t they lmrcw ·i;~1e 2.ppoll2.nt before 1 as ho is their neighbour 2.11ct 2.. rola.tive of Pi-T-1 IIaclijn., T:.:..oy- so.id that t}wy wore nblo to ido,.:t-, ify tho nppol12,.nt beca.uso he ho..cl .:i. torch,. identify )1in, The trii:-..1 r:1agistro:tc l)Cl:i.ovccl -t;10:c ev:id.oHco. I can sec no 1·c:::so,1 - 2 - wi tnessos wi·0:1. 0, p311g~.. Thqro is nloo -c!.rn oviclonco of tb.o two Polico O:Zfic-.J::-, th9 ovic"\.ci,.co b;,,r -~~:o two conpl2.,in2n-i;s ·'.;!·•."';i; t:-10 esppolL:,nt 21<1cl cut t;.100 in -;;;,.o caur.e.o of sto2.linc:; tho bioyclotl· Tl:.c ooic.ssion by tho prosecution to hcwo t>c blood st,:,.,ins 0:i::c.r.1inoc1c to prove t:103r ,~oro of !:xt:1L12.n blooc1. 9 c'.ocr:: not wculcm,. t:·...:, prosecution co.,sc" Evon with.out .tb.c ovic"\.c.100 of tho boocl stn:i.nocl s21irt 9 t>.or is tho boliGvo.blo .oviclcnc0 given by :C:2,c:.ijc-, rn1d hor husbc.ncl. ·i;ho.,t t~1oy positi7 ::.;y iclontifioc1 tho c,ppollcu1to They r12.1xc".. ~'.Ll ·co t.Lo i:ublic tl--.c followi~1 0 1"0 1 ·•,,; ·,c,; u'.lcn thc_y roportoc1. t'.10 -tl~_oft., I Dt,Toc wi t:1_ ·f;_o firi.clings a11d conch,_sio~1 of -~he tri2.l 001xrt~ '1:'i:i.c senfo:,.co inpoocd is only one ;;oo;r .:i,bovo .tho r:,i!li:°:1t11·:: proscri~Joo... In view o:f the f'o.c·;, ·c~:,2,-c the appellru1-t t1sod. n, lethal -r,.ronpon. ir1 ·C~.:..o coonissiOn of tll.c offc11co 7 011cl -cr:.c cor:1pl.:1ino.11ts SL1S·c2,inod serious cut wou:1ds, tho sontcnco ir.iposcc1 properly ro:flcotccl (. the scrious::1ocs of -~;:.o o:ffcnco; I fine'. ·1;1:o sentence .c,ppropj.:-i2,-t;o il1 t}'.o ci:rcuJ.1- stn.ncos .. It CC..lli"10"G be s2.icl to bo OYCeosiV'Oo Trlis 0pponl fails 011d. it is clifJL1issccl i11 its cntirot--J '° JUDGE Dar os S2-12-2.n 10 October, 19813. . Appollo..nt ~)roso:i.1·;; 0 . Konoye 9 Ste.to :*ttornoy? for tho Republic~ _I certify that, it is a trno 2.ncl corrcc·~ copy of tl:c originalo _ __ ____ __. . DEP'iJTY ... , ..?.lXlISTr-L.2