rights international v nigeria communication 215 of 1998 1999 achpr 10 15 november 1999
The Commission found that the facts alleged by the complainant, which were uncontested by Nigeria, established violations of Articles 5, 6, 7(1)(c), and 12(1) and (2) of the African Charter due to torture, arbitrary detention, denial of fair trial rights, and forced flight.
- Citation
- rights international v nigeria communication 215 of 1998 1999 achpr 10 15 november 1999
- Parties
- Complainant: Rights International; Respondent: Nigeria
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Communication / Merits Decision
- Outcome
- Violation found
- Legal Topics
- Torture, Arbitrary Detention, Fair Trial, Freedom of Movement, Refugee Status
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rights International
Complainant
Nigeria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication / Merits Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arrest, detention, and treatment of Mr. Wiwa violated the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
- 2 Whether the lack of access to counsel and information about charges constituted a violation of fair trial rights
- 3 Whether threats and forced flight violated rights to freedom of movement and residence
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission found that the facts alleged by the complainant, which were uncontested by Nigeria, established violations of Articles 5, 6, 7(1)(c), and 12(1) and (2) of the African Charter due to torture, arbitrary detention, denial of fair trial rights, and forced flight.
Court Disposition
Violation found
Orders
- The Commission finds the government of Nigeria in violation of Articles 5, 6, 7(1)(c), and 12(1) and (2) of the African Charter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment