nmb bank plc vs mafubilo general supplies ltd 5 others by way of counter claim rose mutagonga kundecha vs nmb bank plc 2 others 2023 tzhccomd 319 29 september 2023
The 1st defendant breached the facility and amendments; the 2nd and 6th defendants mortgaged the property and consented to the deed of variation; allegations of forgery were not specifically pleaded nor proved by expert evidence; the doctrine of novation applied, transferring liabilities to the 1st defendant; all guarantors are liable as sureties; the plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding sums, interest, general damages, and enforce the securities; the counterclaim is dismissed for lack of merit and evidence.
- Citation
- nmb bank plc vs mafubilo general supplies ltd 5 others by way of counter claim rose mutagonga kundecha vs nmb bank plc 2 others 2023 tzhccomd 319 29 september 2023
- Parties
- Plaintiff: NMB Bank PLC; 1st Defendant: Mafubilo General Supplies Limited; 2nd Defendant: Ibrahim Abdallah Kundecha (Personal legal representative of the late Abdallah Yusuph Kundecha); 3rd Defendant: Grace Irigo; 4th Defendant: Juma Bakari Said; 5th Defendant: Husna Jaffari Mafubilo; 6th Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff: Rose Mutagonda Kundecha
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's suit allowed; counterclaim dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Loan Default, Mortgage Enforcement, Guarantee Liability, Forgery Allegations, Counterclaim Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NMB Bank PLC
Plaintiff
Mafubilo General Supplies Limited
1st Defendant
Ibrahim Abdallah Kundecha (Personal legal representative of the late Abdallah Yusuph Kundecha)
2nd Defendant
Grace Irigo
3rd Defendant
Juma Bakari Said
4th Defendant
Husna Jaffari Mafubilo
5th Defendant
Rose Mutagonda Kundecha
6th Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st defendant breached the facility and amendments
- 2 Whether the 2nd and 6th defendants mortgaged the property to the plaintiff
- 3 Whether the 6th defendant consented to the mortgage
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st defendant breached the facility and amendments; the 2nd and 6th defendants mortgaged the property and consented to the deed of variation; allegations of forgery were not specifically pleaded nor proved by expert evidence; the doctrine of novation applied, transferring liabilities to the 1st defendant; all guarantors are liable as sureties; the plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding sums, interest, general damages, and enforce the securities; the counterclaim is dismissed for lack of merit and evidence.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's suit allowed; counterclaim dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Declaration of breach by 1st defendant of facility letters and amendments
- Declaration of breach by 2nd and 3rd defendants of mortgage and variation deeds
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment