19941115 TZHC Dar es Salaam 1
Ex parte judgment was improperly entered based solely on affidavit evidence without oral proof or strict proof of damages; lower court failed to identify points for determination and reasons for decision as required by Order 20; revisionary powers exercised to set aside judgment and decree, and order retrial before...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19941115 TZHC Dar es Salaam 1
- Parties
- Applicant: Nokoino University of Agriculture; Respondent: Josophat Hyituo
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Revision / Ruling on Application
- Outcome
- application granted; ex parte judgment and decree set aside; order for retrial
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Ex Parte Judgment, Damages, Revision of Lower Court Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nokoino University of Agriculture
Applicant
Josophat Hyituo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Revision / Ruling on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient grounds exist for extension of time to appeal out of limitation period
- 2 Whether ex parte judgment was properly entered based on affidavit evidence without oral proof
- 3 Whether special and general damages were properly awarded without strict proof
Ratio Decidendi
Ex parte judgment was improperly entered based solely on affidavit evidence without oral proof or strict proof of damages; lower court failed to identify points for determination and reasons for decision as required by Order 20; revisionary powers exercised to set aside judgment and decree, and order retrial before competent magistrate.
Court Disposition
application granted; ex parte judgment and decree set aside; order for retrial
Orders
- Order for revision issued; suit to be heard de novo before competent magistrate
- All orders consequent upon ex parte judgment invalidated and set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
lit T::._: 0 app1:tc 8,.r1; l~i:1.1:).J.tTICK O.,K., HCiO.:..GO :f:Ucd t\is a})l)l:i.cation Under Oection, ; 14 of t::o i.auo of L:Lwitation ~·..ct,1Jo.10 1971 .:i-11d. 3ectio11 9~ of t>. e c.r.c, 1966. lie is pr2.:,;i~1;_; :2or o:;;:t0'.1sion of tin0 to L'1::rci tute an e,:p:,102,1 aca.i..:."lst t:~o ....... jur~eino~1t a:..1t"i. d.ocroo in Civil Case 1v"o.4 of 1993 of t:io :Di,:,·crict Court of HoroL,oroo :Zo is aJ.Go prayin~· for oostr1 of t;1c applicatio;.1. Tho aJplication is sup po rt oc1 1-::i. t'.::. i\I0 oni:;o '13 affidavit• The facts c:v..: clisclo □ ecl by tl:',o v.i'fido;-d t is t::.:.at t::;.c Ros:powlont • plaintiff filed an c1I11c::,1cl.o(l j_)laL1t on tho 4tJ:. 1.~u._:;1..wt, 1993 ar1rJ_ t?.:o CD.De uas fixed. for mention o;.1 t)·,o 19th 1..u;:_,"1..l.at? 1993.t:us l.3,ttor d~,.to ( 19/D/93) tho respondent On succcosfull;r obta..i.n0d lo;;.vo to :pr·ovo t 1-.o 02/J'J ox-J_)arto n:_·· af:~icln.vi t clue to tho applicv.nt 1s avonnont that :,_(, w2,rJ ::1ot ;-,-,1-:-2.1·0 t!,nt t:.c c.::-..r.,c u:;,u 0ot do1m for 1m1tio11 on t::c 19t:'.: iJlgust, 1993 no:r ·,r2.o ~:.o aware t:·'.;:,t c::;:-pv,rto jud{;'ornout ):tad bom o:,1tcrod. ae;a:iJ.1st tto applicant. TJ:..c C:;?]}lic211t 1 ,.-J c;r:.,:.i.n Go,::::?lo,int is on. t]10 .award of 3:.~Go5,ooo,ooo/= an scnoraJ. cl2J.1r-..ccn base,<l on to:;:i;:',.0110 clai;:1 I)lUS another a.w~rc:1. of 0~10.,25,000/= a;s oyocie'.l d.aII12..::os allcJoc1.l;;- ,:'..:r.isinG from injury of 0!12.ractor a. .osaasination on tJ.~o p3,i--t; of t:10 rosponclont - c1:;:i::;ilice).1to Thr::t; such awa,'.'cl coulo.. not bo just Drn,ntoc. 0:1 ;:,., more swoe.rinr; o;:- a:i?fi:rming en affidt.vi t. Proof of cwio..cncc is 110000;:.7,ry. Hi:?l.:lightinG t:.:.o applio2. .at 's c,lYQlication, Hr. Kapi11{sa, Leazned counsel for tho applicclJ1t, r;1tatocl t~1at it is r.::t r2.;;.1,::o on t:"'.cj_r part to observe 2,t ::;>arn, 6 of t:10 cno;.1docl pleint of t>.o ros:;_)oncl.cnt to contain 2. c1ofar.:1atory clain on tto accow.1t Jc:.:2,t tJ:::.o ap:pli<!:2,nt rofuccd to -po.,y no,1o;y in 00,.1..10.:ri on wi t::i. t:.~o est at o o:f t;\c 8.0000,sod . 2 ;.nne, Joyce Rut2,bo.nzibua 'lrho 2-iod. ir:..t~;::;td:, i,1 fl. c?,r r,cci·'.c;.1t on t::o 10tl: uf !..u,:,u::it? 1S191 to t:~;.; ro,Jpcnd.01t - :!l:'.'3.,1tiffo ~~1:::,,t -~:~::i rofuso.l .-mD just:i.:.cio': lJcc2.uso t:10 G'.;t2.to - 110~10;.r --:m.o J:),:>ii:1. to ·f .c: true: a:.l'.1 -::-ctuaJ. :-:..1.;·:iaiotrat,n•, ot t 1:o d;;,con3od n o::it.:too It :i.s furt'. or f.ii..1.'1T.1:'.t :~cQ t;~~',t tl:o so callol~ n~··u,1.. _ ouoa1tn 2..t pw_;o 7 of i/:.c ')rocoodinGn i~; :::,t j~1,130:no..11t at :9roscribo::; "b'~o,t 2., juc\:;omc.,1t nuot not on1y bo consiso ~ut cJ.Go t: .2,t tl.J.o ctato...1Gn-G t;:ordn rJU;:;t i:;:,ou t'... o :poL:t2 of J.ot1-..:1iua,tio:,1, ·i;' .c, C.oci sio;,1 t:..,oroo::1 d.!ld t?.to i"too..:1011 fo:r St1.c:l cloui::;i_oj.1o o.~1 tl:;..c rrt1--G1:1t_;tb o:£" t}.:.c 2)11.yv·c rcn..oonz, t;:.c Pra3d.rtg aTllicaat :L::i · ·/. ·, :i:or c:;ctonsion o:2 t:!.r.,r1 ~·or lo~v,:; to :f::U.o .-·,:1:-:,ocl out of ti::10 to enable ),.:i.r.1 0021tq-;t c.:_;::w.,1. ~ t'·.o 8;;::i.:·:. jl,•::_,0,1Qi1to ,;.t tho :iocr.'-':f-¼i ot t:-.ic a::,,)lic~t:~c-;·1 Iiro ~(o.j?iaz:a oJ.:·i.,:c/~ t'.,c.t t.'.:o rosponc1.ont J ozophat Ilu.,:piLllCc;JU wan i:ropcrly [J,;rrcI '.:ut u2:-:i n.oi; j_):;:•.:,::; ,_ :·c :u cou:i.--t o i.c1ni tt cclly I ovuJ~ looh:x,r:. on t:ii :J c~L;;i~,ct :-:,,11:1 I t,J:1; 1.:;d to a~roc ,;:i. t:. -~_. _;..Lo,:-:i:ncd Cou;,1;:101 CJ1J.r.t1bor i.1urJr.10i1s a;.10. t'.~c forr·i2,:rdii1,: .1ot:Lc:; 1:~..;ilc writ!.,;,:·_: :;:•...1.J_··- .l_. of t)"o ap-pli cdJ.0::1 I l,,:wo noted ~-ri t;·_ :ro:-;1·d -i;; _,,,-;; 1:fro K:1:-Jill[:;2, ~r;:-,c ·.wt co:;:'j~cct wllon \o info:..--r.1ccl r.ic, t:.:.o,t t1:8 ro □:pon:'.cn-t u.:--.r.: ,Jorirodo T}:cro :i.i:_\ :.·.o i_;,r:V.onco to t!:r,t offcct. ~TcriTortholocr;, I t'.--..i.:11:: it :Lo clr:;o r,~y c1.v.t;y- to c:~;:,r.1L1.o RS w!.10t>.o:r t:.to 2,pplicatio:1 :i.r3 GUGtaj_nablo in t~w circumsta.ncos ;:,,r.:; rc-locl,1:i by tl::.o 2.):)lio2,- nt' s aff:'v.°L2-vi t c~;.cl tl::.o cv.bmis3ion DLv:c '0-,y Hr. X.:1:ping2-, counsel for t:.1..0 ~okoin.o u~1i vorGi t7 of .:.:_::ricul turo. 0:ci;r.;.1c1 to !-:,or~.od of lin:i.tatio:a. for t>.o ,-x9::;lic2,at to ii.1;;-t:i.i;nto an a:,:,p02l out of timo, not":i t:'.::.r.;tr..ndi:az tt.o,t t::c po~Lod o:: lir.1i taticn J1.C'..;:; o. .::;)irocl. n.rJ pror:.icr-l 1xx1 U.."ldor soct:i.cn 14 ... ( 1) of' .:..ct lfo.10 of 1971 (Limitr.•,tio~: .·~r:.t)o It ia CC'i'i!.-.10:1 (,rJu.1c1 t:l~,t c:;:-p2,rto jud;;o,10~1t .-re,s 0!1tf0.,1cc1. oll t:·"c 2nc1. (~.,-~- o}': :.ic::,tonbor, 19S:3 2~:;cinst t:.:o 2.::?:.1J.ic0.:.'lt ~Jokoi:10 U:.1ivorr.;:Lty o:~ ~", ..:rioul turo (:.. u::·o:L:1 rofor::c-od [1,f; ,3U..'a). T)::.on on t;.1c:, 1'7t:.~ dc-,,y of :Jopto:,1t0:r., 1~;:_'3 t: . o :c:):1licacrc :;·u.c~~ 2. o~:.c.u:Jor n:pplication ( supportoC:. ,:;".t:.::. en 2,fficlavi t) c,~:ok:L'.t(: :::_;_1 o:i.-{:.o:r to :.rnt '.',:::-i-.7.o t~}.o ox-)cirtc ju·.'.cmcnt ·-,,,..______ 3 for ~,n orD.or cottL.1c; nsi(lo ·Lu o;:-::_;nrtc j1.·_,__ ,c:·,,..,:.1t., '.~':,\Y: t· · ::·. •.;..:.,;::.,. t\ifJ 2.:7:-ilicr,tion appce.m to :1,::v-0 hocn on t'..:c 1Ct!: of ""':,i:;:.-:i.1 7 1'.)9t1-o Tl.:i~~ :iI',._; :nre t:.:.2,,11 90 c1n;;ro frorJ tllc c.bto of t:-.o rulin~: ,.,__ ,tcil 11/1/1'.J'.Mo Jor:rpi to ·1/ c .:i,:):)lico.tion for otc.y of o:r:ccuti on it r-;oul.: 8.~Y)cnr t'::ctt v·: .,uL:i:i. ,1i1 1· ;; 1~;-~J~;,:;,G;C: .•i~l---:./c of t;;. 0 vol.:iclco ,rci'o <v_·,.:t,-;~:j.i .. '- out n.:::t por t:·.c. c8u1,t's o:r:·or c12,i;c:1 11/4/1994. T):-.o c1ttncL:od r-10tc:r:--vo>iclo~: 1·rnro roloc,sc(i. afto:r t:.10 · a:i?11lica::.1t. ~-o:L)ositoc1 s;.,.s. 1 9000 9ooo/= 2.i-:: Gocurt;r :i..,.1 tcn.,s ol Or:2cr 21 ro24 (3) of t:.:.o c,;.0., 1966. It woul•::1.. c1,1:11:1oar t::,:.t t~\c :sooci;1:".. aJ1)lic2.tion fo~c r..;ott:i.:n___: ,:1.oido t.'.,o o:z::-.02,:;..,.tc ;;'--'.'.~-~:a-:io-1t war:; to be ',o,\r,~ oa t:-.o 2'.:::t> f.-J?ri.1 7 1994 but ~-ms 8Ajourncd to ?.,/5/?A bocn.u.30 t~:.o c\i)lic2,,.1t - ju:·.j)L!o.1t ,~.01Jt0r w:1r; -wt :_1:..'0G•~.1to .Jtill 0Y1 ·c:·-.r,,t :::.at,::i t:.:.c <1:~·,,::,lic,~::.t m,G .wt :).ro,0~1t ,vi.~ t. ·.0 n~ttcr u~.,:: :pus.':cc1 to !J./5/S4 f,;T' :.,rr:rt:;_ono 1 On t~_,i,.; T:"c Di strict Gourt ;;I'r.l..ntc:l t\(i n.;__,]?l:i.catio:a aJl('.. r.1acl.c n;1 ,r:".o:c :for t' .o 1r:l.t'~cl.r,,,w1 of t::e,t o,::_:>J)lic2,tiono T:10 Loc1rnc<l tricl 1-~n...:,iotro,to a.lr;o :'.:i.rc,Jto,1. t:~at t'·.c n;ppli o;:m t lff,fJ .::.t li bcrty to fil o , .. .; c-· .......t..l>,.) Mro Ka,p5.:132, tLon reacted on tLc 30t1.':. of L-uyst? 1991;. w:.:cn l:o f:i.lc.;d t:.o 1)rcr_;c.1t c'._.o.f.i~Jcr application for o:do'.1;:iion_ of tir;1c.. ·i;o f.',lo c:-qpocl •mt A ti □ co :u.tti11:; c1f',_i.clo 2J.l of u!J.at roe.lly hc,J. ~c;ppmocl. in t::c '.',.:;.r.:;trict con.rt concc:r.ni:n.:; t · .;.; Lti.::;e,rdHo a:.1:.l in o:;r-J?lica'!:JJ.o r1.cl8.;Ys to f:U.o ~1rovcr u.pplic['.t:i.:Ji1 f,-Jr t>.o sotttn:_; c..ci:lc 0$ tl'.c o:z-:)~rto ~u~30,J0nt 9 t~w 2,__rpJ.ic:::-.nt I o a:ffi,bv-:'~ t .... • tJ. ..., l:o 102,:cat oi:' a_l)Ocl :.,,1.: '.:)c·:;1 ):('Gtor:ro~~ ,;0 t:.,:. ,~J.·i;.,i:.~--·c::_:.;:·ro..:c:l_;;- .•:i·2~·_:'._,:1L·. 1.:ll•.~:Jr Rule 13 o(1) ,.•:c O:C\1.or 1X ,)f t:·.r; o:·,.vn i'r:;co::tr,:c, C,).'.o ·-_:.- .:i.,:.> c.t::.tlc; ·c; . .r ··_:);'0:::1,-:.r:;:it tc i:'-:?}:l~-- ;:.:1,.c:L t: • 5 1futlo I nn f'ortifid by a nuobor of aut~·10ri tion ii.1::rl sting that r;;uffj_cicnt rori.son has to bo tl::.o docLlins- factor in en 2,pplicatim for an onl0rco-:1cnt of tirJo 9 and. also teldn;; into vi ou t).10 fact tht'..t t):i s c:1urt :.ias u:.1fottcrod. dis..-- crcticn tJ extend tine for loe.vo t0 arrpoal out of tine, hcwovcr9 1·0;.;ard rnmt e.lso be !1~1 to the nnnner and way the procccclin~;s wore h,_,ndod by tho trie.l court. If I unclorstD,i.1c1 tho applicant 1 s effid2-ti t coneotly9 couplcrl with tho subnisoion nc..dc before no by Hro Kapinge., counsel :fer tho applicnnt, tbo nain co1:11)laint is that c;r2.vc inju.otico we,s acce.ss:i.::mccl by tllc trial c,)urt wll.011 it awarclod to tho plaintiff - decree hold.er (rcsi')on--lo,.'1t) Shs.,5,000,000/= ao gc:a ore.l cl2.x:i2,eos:, an::~ Shs. 25 9 ooo/= as spoci aJ. cl.eJJ2,3cs ba2c.<l en c. sinpl e c.von:1c;.1t of tho responr1c:1t IS ai'fi~le.vi t wi tb.out proving the .?J.l oc;ecl conpJ.aint by Ol'2.l e-..rid.cnco., Tllri.,t ~1 affic12,vi t cuulcl. not on tL.o (balance of) i:,ropendoro., nee of ovid.011ce prove tl:o ell cc;od (Lcfn;:12,t,)r-J d12.r2-ctcr 2.ssasRion of tho )ln:intif.f ·without heYinG recour,1e to real cvL-;.c.1cc by tho plcintiff's wi tncssos. It is nlso quostic112..blo 2,,'J ~n1, t:.~o ;,lciritiff' z cl.:.2,r2..ctcr cculc'. have been injured en t:,o 2.ccount of tho f2,ct V:::.2,t t:1c 1.pplicc1.nt-clofcnd2.i1t rcf'uscd. to r.1nkc J?c~011t out r)f -the est ,1tc of t~ sC :1ccoc.acd f~no. J oyco Rutr)Jr1.nzi bwe to t:::.o ro3p011dont for rc2,son th2,t t!ic r.10:1cy we,s ·"',ctuclly paid. to tJ:e e/'.r:1:L-iif:ltr2.tor of t;:1e dccoasod' s cot2,to ono Wilson SarJsono Whether this state::ic.nt is correct or 11'.)t, t!10 :point that outs right accross ny nind is ullcther t],e tricl He.,,::;istrr,tc W2>'3 right in :passinc; tl1c Jud5'ment en facts bP.sod on e, swom e.ffid2Yi t an·:. not on o-ricl.cnoo proting the oxtcct of a.ax.1agc or injury to t::.c plaintiff's ch2.ractor 2,11.d cxposi tion, t~-ic princi:plo used in cloteming tho quantw of c1an2,.3os awarded 1 ct 00 -tcra,., It is clso tho rule of law that spocicl danagos nro n:,t ccnerally e,ssesoccl but nuot strictly be provec', 'by concrete ovidcncot 2J.1cl. in nost cases b;y- c1.ocuumte:,rrJ ovidcncoo I have painstcld.ngly dclvc::l into t:.:.o entire record of t;lc loucr co:.irt 1th a view to asccrtaini110 as what woro tho actucl. avomonts st2.tcd in the effide;vi t filed to prove tho plaintiff's c2.oo cx-pe:,rtc., It 1ms not iii thout <~ifficulty, I cl.arc s~, to pcrcoivc fron all ·t!lo e,ffid2,vl ts foua.:l in tho court reconl that only one 2,:f'fidavi t tcndo to show tJ.:.2.t it could be t:w one purporting to be one as such filed in proof of t'.1.0 :Jlcinti:f'f's 02,r.:30. If then I an riGht th2,t the ovary effidavi t I ar.1 rofo:rrinc; to is the one filocl in support of the plaintiff's cle.io, with i3'reatost roopcct, one doscrvoo to be polj_)loxcd bocauoc tho a.fficlavit itself docs unoquivocelly ste,to as for what it socks to sup1Jort. Fbr tho sake of this ruling llXld bcncfi t of tho p?,rtios, it is worthwhile to ~'.)W wl1e,t t::10 affidavit avers, stnrtinc5 fro□ pare, 2 thoroofs / • • 0 •. 0.06 I.. 0 6 2. That I 0J:1 t~10 ]:older of u :porror of c.ttu:...-r1037 by 0:10 llilson Hyituo, ,-i:,o was duly O-i1:0oi:r'licC. .Ac1·,d.,--iistrutor of t:.:o oui;:;.,to of ono 1:.nna Joyce Rutaho;,1zib-tra now docc2.scd. T}:.at as a J.1oldor c:::- such pouor atto:ino;~r I prooontod all clo.iIJs due \ to t:10 estate to tJ:o dcfonda.nto 4. That initially t1.10 dofcndaJ.1t paid. all tt.c prooontod duos to file ro1d I <:Wontually roc.1ittocl t'...-;.o same to the 2,GI.1j_nistr2.tor of the o:-:Jtdoo 5. T:::~c:.t ,ken I pror·catod t:·;o dccoc,r.;ocl 's insurcnco claims, anJ. o.:r"tcr I ,,. had incurred GL'.,DO OXJ:l0i.1GCG following t::.1.0 clains up anJ. clown to · Dar cs salaam, I J.:.2)¥lod .over t:.10 cl:oq_uo to t!:,o iofondG,.lto 6. '1'.hat instead of' ir.;r;l1.i.;.13 ,..10 w:i. t~ . . t:.:o c:.::.oquo 2-G t:·.o:r 1.,A.d done before t::le dcfoncli:l:at flatl:·· :rofu::;o'.l to clo oo, inplici tly casting doubt over ray crcc1i bili ty a:1d : .ouorc;ty. 7. That as a rcs-~11 t o:Z cue:. 2..cti on I fol t :::;re2-tly hm bl od doun a11cl insti tutocl the preso-i:1t suit to, restore i:1/ :Jic.;·nity Mc!. t0 :rcomrcr de..1uaecs for t:.'.o uro113 inflicted upcn l'.1e bJ tl:o dofcndanto I ar.1 D. That I vonily a,nci__ stron0 ly believe L:.sntitlec1 to tho rol:Lofs claimed in t:1e plc:in-t. lihcrcfore I pray for jm'..gracnt a::ld. decree E:g'9.inst tJ.:e cofc.1da:1t as sl:oi-~1 in t:.10 plainto Fra:i sud1 e.ffidav-it, in tb.o first place it w~s not cY.b.2,nstivcly pi·ovec1.. t::.at the applicant-defcnd.2.J:lt we..s obliged to pay the raonc~;r from tho dec·Jascct' r.i est de to tho rcs~o11dent - plaintiff. In othenror:1s no 0Vidcnc0 called fron t 1 ·,0 ad.ministr2.tor of tho c-atate 9 or even the bcneficio.r,y· to positively confirm the,t tho aJ.lo:;-cd power of attolllcy haJ. exclusively eJ1c.1 abnolutoJ.y reg).l~ .. r:d that tl.i.c doccasod."s property sl:.ould be hendod oY.:::r to t~io plaintiff ( respondent )o Secondly, it uas not shown :iJ.1 ovL1cnce what w1"0:.1c tho 2.: 1pliccnt - dofoacl£'.,.'1t 0 112.d. 008fi1i ttod by s0-i1dinc t:10 nonoy in tlle -'l..eceaoou I s ostat o directly ~~,: t'...:o prima:r;.7 cot1rt of t:.~e c11•02, in w:tlcb. t::.ia ,-._r1-:dnistr2,tor of j_)roperty is or W2.S residing? TirirrJ.y3 it is not ox_plo.incd in v'rii'..ence9 c,s to what wes t},o stULlbling block prcventinL>· t2:.c rospo.1c~ont - plcintif-.f to collect tl-:.o Seid nonoy f'roiu tho primary court to ~i:ich t~rn Doney was oo..1t f,,r collection as long as he W2.G holdinJ t~.:o po1rnr of attozncy no to do? All these quostioaa 9 in ny conoi.:ororl viow~ ra:iain unanswered and in effect it ow1.1ot 9 wi t~:out rca:i:lonablo cri ticisn 1 be said t:int tJ-.c ju.\::;mmt we.o ju:1.icinlly~ let alone jucliciour.ilJ1 made I 7 unclcr ::iuc~~ circtu:intc,..1cos. I N.l ta;1ptod. to bcliovo 7 i'J11 Dlso b.oLl as in.timato::l by t::.c e,r>::?lio2,nt 1 ::i c0lli1::rnl-; IIro K:1,pinc12, 9 tl.12.t rc&li;.i:; f1..:)m tLc af:ficle:,ri t 2.:,.1c1 ju,lco-~u!rc; 9 u~.12.t t'..:o :9l2,..i.?.1tiff hol,b 2,:--,i a, juc._:;oi.1011.t, if; not 2- juJi3L10!1t wi tJ,i.11 t:.o no2,;:J.i;.1;; of sub-rule ;:. of Or,.or 20 ,:-{,ich pro-,riJwz of t'.·.o c2.co 7 t 1 1c., poi.nt:J f0r :~otorr.1L1.'."'.tion 9 tl--..o cloci~~i0:.1 t.' .,.;:-.?co:1 9 2:.1;: t~Ae: roc:-..;:;0.13 f:,1' ouch c.locir.d.on 11 • ;l'hat :12.f.l boon c1c.. c-wi :. . ,-y1_, ,-._._,,...., J. u.:.,';":-1"•lt .... I.J:.>Ol'r,,l 1.· ,, ")n .,,... 5 cf t,h ,, t,rnoc1 ')l"OCoorlinrrsft ~t .:.<-u~ • .L-'-'-''-''-• ~"- ... _. cs , ,.,~ </J:' • .l. ' O ~ a,.1:l. io cle.tcc1. 2/9/93 9 a.,.:d it rc,--:,.clsi "Court: :!12,viP..J c;m1c t;:c.rouc;J:., t?.:.c e,f'ficlavi t lot t;·.o ju~\;Dont ont orcd ao prayo::1-1'., .As I llc;iTo 2,,ttcmptocl. to /J'.ow ab:)Yo 9 tho nfficlcwi t (heroin above roci tocl.) Hsolf io insufficient to coi.1::;isoly 2,:.1.:l conclusively proved tho fncts for conoic1oraUon. ancl c~.ct omination 7 nor ,~.oos t:- o said 11 jud,3□ ont" shows tl.c l)ointz for c1oto:ruination 7 ancl o;.1 11' ,c.t rov.oons on u!:.i cl:. tl'..o '."loci oi on w2,p, fow1clo::'... Al tl:ouc;-h the ap:;_)lica.tiOil before 1.10 in to sock ax:tonoion of tine for lcr.vc to file a...11. i:.itondcd al)pocl outsiclo tho prcr~cribcc1• li1-:litation po:riod., ir~ LlJ inclinotl. vi ou1 it will not Dcivc tho i:.1terost cf juotioo w:1othor to ,_;r2nt or refuse t:::.o application boce,usc t:->.c ju\§JO:lt or ctocrcc sot1t1ht to be ap-Jc2lccl f:ror:i n2,rJ noi thcr jutlgc·,1c11t nor proper clcciflio:.1 fou;.1;loct 011. the corr0ct ri:d. i1ci:plor:.: of lo..wo · In t!:.is ro0 r,rc.~ I ::,we n.:, dtorn,..,,tivo 0ut tc ~ ..i.Nolrn t'.10 2.:'sC!:i.tim1nJ. powers of rovir.;ion coa:fe1.,->;r;>od upon t.ir:; court i;.1tcll,rJ of r-;oction 44 - (2) of tho 1\1.?.,,::;istratcs' Court □ l.ct, 1?D4 w:.:ich sc..~m: " Ll,LI,.-( 2) In a:1.ch tio~1 to c'.,l.lY ot: .c:;:- J.)Ji'iC:rfJ iu tl:.o.t bc~1df confcrrocl urion tho !Iieb. Court 7 t:.~c llit;b. Court - racy, in e:ny procccclL'10 of e, Civil nature n.otomino:1.. in e. r.1.iotr.i.d vv~- ~ er c\ c:Jui"li of a rcr.::i-.1o.'1.t mc,ciotrdo~ on ap::_)lic2,tic:1 1.Jo:i.nc; maclo in t!12.t bohclf by any p2,rt;r or of i to o~in motfoE_, if it a:.)pcn.rn t~.1.d t~icro Las been 2Jl error i;iatcriel to tho mcri to of tho ce.r:io invol vine; justice, revise t~10 :;_)rocooc:Ligs 2;.1cl make oucl: ::1.oci Gion or o r\l.cr t!1oroin 2,D it soa'.lD fit i I e.n ni.r1c1f'ul of t:.~o se:vinc :provioion un::lo::c tb.o e,ub-scction thE,t unlcr-m tLo offoct of ,;uch rovif'.ion in tc, i.ncrc;;i,sc any SUw awa:tt1cc'~ or al torin~; t:·~o i-1.r;~·lts of 2,ny pc.rty to :1i3 '.1.otru1ont? it in not ncccose.r·y t:.-:.c,t tb., pc.rtiooi o:;:o 0::.10 of tJ:m, m~at be I)rco0,;.1t 2..t t:.'.o t:i.Lio for revision ir-; r::c.J.c~ or t~c'..t ;.1ud first be .... I c;ivcn an apJ?ortunity to bJ :.1.0.1,rtl., In tJ,c ;,resent caDo t:1c oi tur,ticn i::; tl,.f'.t t~::.e j_):r.oooe1in3c in t' ;_c iH strict court arc such t:l<'--t t '-o:~ bo rovL1od, r,;.1:l arc acoor,,j.11c;ly roVi sC'"-l, 2,.i.lS. -::ri tl: a di rcction t}.12,t tLo rJUi t be J:.02,r-.1 _d.:..o_2l£_YQ. bcfo:co 2.,i.1:-,t'. .c-1r Me.:;istrato of co!Jpotont juris,.:.tctio;:1e It fcJ.lowG t!:.croforo t?.:::,,i; 2]_1 t>.o 0r:.orn 1:i.c1.,,lo ccnrJog_uont upon t:.:.2,t ju:lc;wo,T~ (1.l~o iµ-vaLdat oc~j a;.1::l. accor~:i.11clj- 2,:ro set e.r.rl.d.c I ocl<:c.: llv order e,s te- codu., J1DG-.J J1J.DG.J .l..pplicant Li.b:::ont Respondent Abso:1t A.O., Il!lUJLJ~ JUDGE -· GR0ili1a T?.:.o Ord.or for rovil:;ion be SU)Dliod to the l)artics upon pe.J11.1ent of' foes~ accor.:lin[.;' to l;.:,w. JVuGD Cortif'iod t:tuo copy of' t~·:o Cricinalo