Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19990507 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Interim relief cannot be granted due to irregularities in affidavit evidence and premature application.

Court disposition

interim relief denied

02

Material facts

Parties

Not specified

Applicant

Not specified

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Interim Application / Ruling on Interim Relief

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant seeks an order restraining entry onto Plots No. 187 and 188 held under Title Numbers 47291 and 47290, claiming occupation and enjoyment rights.
Respondent
Respondent challenges the sufficiency and regularity of the applicant's affidavit evidence, noting similar irregularities in their own counter-affidavit.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General principles of affidavit evidence

    Affidavit evidence must be regular and based on personal knowledge except for matters based on advice, which must be specified.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Interim relief cannot be granted due to irregularities in affidavit evidence and premature application.

Court disposition

interim relief denied

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 7 May 1999

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 7 May 1999

19990507 TZHC Dar es Salaam

IN I 2. Jor-.:rr-J it~::Gc.tnJrf\;u::·~/~ "., o o o o o o ~ o) •••• o O o Cl •"\}if-'LIC/\J-•IT s f j The first • from ent2ring pArcels of lqnd ide~tified ~s Plots No. J8'l And J88 situate ;:1t J.-,.,:.:.~·1:,:ni B.,:, .. ,c:-., :ds,r ,:::s s::,l:;,.c·u:i, held under TitJ.e N,Hi11.,c 47291 .qn0 47290, rosptivr::d_yo T)::~~ ;:. ~ ::~·.;:( :r-eliof .:..s :-.:"l ·Jrder occup.qtion or cnjoy~ant of the a~ij ;iocc~ ;f l~nd. I ;;=-1vci ex.q\;,iooQ th1; 0vic\0,-;c-;:; qn::" j_t >qs e(~ner.:::illy c,ccurred t2- n-3 tJ2,'\t :Jotb qffid"'!v' ·'..; su:ff'0r ::':':;:•o·.: f-'lt::cil irregulqrities The deponents II is true t~ tb2 b0st of ~ur knowledge, sqvc qs to m~ttero de~one~ on ~n ~dvisa (~ic), spacir.. . . ied ;;ind S{.>t Qu·t l1eretn=-=-i~;ove'; • .q f:fic.'hvi t h,q :::: to : "3. corro·:·:or,---: toe :.,y .yfoo::;.~ ovidenc~, by :=tf'fid--=i.vit• or viwi. vos2..i, :)f 1 t~.ose 1~<,<:•~:.·lo -~-ih9 f.:;ourced the 2 IdonticAl ~rregulities qfflict the counter ~ffidqvit. . . it ~G ne'ler~heless ~remnture. f~r intGrirn crCcr □ tl:Jis one :nust >e It c:-:1nn::::t be ue :.i vcrad.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.