19920619 TZCA Dar es Salaam1
There was no cogent evidence that the service line supplied by TANESCO was faulty or caused the fire; responsibility for faults in internal wiring lies with the owner and their privately employed electricians, not with TANESCO.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19920619 TZCA Dar es Salaam1
- Parties
- Appellant: Numani Abdallah Mbuyu; Respondent: Tanzania Electric Supply Co. Ltd. (TANESCO)
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Liability for Fire, Causation, Evidence Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Numani Abdallah Mbuyu
Appellant
Tanzania Electric Supply Co. Ltd. (TANESCO)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether TANESCO was liable for fire damage to appellant's house allegedly caused by electrical faults in service lines supplied by TANESCO
- 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence to prove the fire originated from TANESCO's service lines
Ratio Decidendi
There was no cogent evidence that the service line supplied by TANESCO was faulty or caused the fire; responsibility for faults in internal wiring lies with the owner and their privately employed electricians, not with TANESCO.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed in its entirety
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. ''1' OF 1991 BETWEEN ·, NUMANI ABDALLAH MBUYt:J • . • • • · • · • APPE:LLANT 1 ·Af.!Jt- . .. TAN~i~A ELECT~IC ~UPPLY co. LTD.-. RESPONO£N7 I (Appo.al frem.-a Judgement· and dec·r•e -,f the High, ~eurt·• •f Tanzar,ia at ·tar es Salaam) I 1 <t1anhan,:a ;J1..> ·dated· the 20th day •f· 'Sei>t~~r,. t ~ in 11<- '· 1 ·. ti1.s,h'C•urt Civil Case·· N!•'·· 249 ~f 1987 JUDGEMENT'OF THE COURT . The· it1i,ellant Numanf' A•·dallah Mbuyu had his h•use ,:--,g~\"y~·d .lty fin 'which start~d -fi:-em electrical ·wires f"lf his · •, hi,use • ., He ·,sued M/S Tanzania Electric Supr,ly Co. Ltci~. 1f•r damages'· Y! having ali:.wed faults in the wiring-~f his ~ ' ••··n,9use te continue until it reached such a state which 1'ade eletrical supply r,f energy a ·danger t• his house. 'Ihe •le,arned :• . trial )ud~~ atter heari~ the. ., evidenc·e from t~ app'ellall·l: and his witnesses ,ind the respcnd'ent11 Company' tt empleyee·s• concluded that·the fire did net start·f.l"'em the !!enice lin~ ~mi rig "f-reiiil the main •utside and installed-•y the. defendant Company rather that it &tarted elsewhere and it could well be from inside the house where 'it was· first-seen / T 2 ~y P • W• 2 the tenant Lu:pondo Mwalimu. The· ~wnf!Jr of -the hWse and his wife were r,ot in the houae at the .t.ime the fire.. broke out which was about 10 a~m. 'l'he rcap4'~dent 1 s. :I side also did t'IOt help much 1n leceting the soarc:e e'f filie. I n.w.2 morely receunted tho electrical fault in the same house which occurred on 6/11/~e. · 6n this d:~y n·.w~2 stated that whon he visited appellant's housc,he noticed a lino which was supplying energey toe. banda wad·touchint ·, -:~· I a tin reof and intei:-foring with the currlnt. He· then r&rne~ I ''-c--~· the. fuse from th~ main switch at'ld so cut off the supi;>ly ef electricity t0 the randa and then informed the afoOellant I t• •"-' leek for an ex~erienced electrician to make the necessary I rei,airs. A mont~ later the fire l!>roke ~ut al\d dea~ye4 I l· I In this state of uncertainty it was ,,ot'considered:..aaf~. ey the learned tri.d jcdge to shift the blame on t, the ,. tlectric Supply Cemp8ny (TANESCO). We have the repert of Tanesco dated the 3/4./!7 on their i.nvesti"at.1ons. inl:v the cause of fire and we find it to be unbiased. The Tane .tl!O report which 1s dated 5/3/87 states as follows: "The :::>ire ~ri,ade -report show~ that the fire ~tarted in. the •aidd~'.e ~m •11 the ter~,. :re:,:b@!d by one__ ~.:-.1:ia. Huruka. The service li,:ne . heuse··•racket end mebtir 1".,oard were near the ~•f>em on the .ri!ht. Service line te other nelilr'l]y h•-'Uses originated -. :f~m thi& Mbuyu 1 s house •racket, and no comr,laints have ever Deen received from these consumers. We thexefere, rule out the p~ssibility that t.Jle firl .erupted due to faulty electric• supply on our p-,wer 11:ies and th~ Company is not responsible f~r the dieeste» that }lefell NduQU Mbuyu". • ..... /3 .. .: ~.- ::::-;:..~?~ . ,~~-:;;:-=~---/ .,,_~~. ··r·---. ,? .. -- -···-·· ·-·. 3 .-- Taking _int•.-acc:Mlunt ,the fact, as discl~l!Ped in the evidence, . ~-·· that ··all electrical lines in the house are installed 1-y the electricians· em~:t9Yed "privately by the· owner ef. t~e .hou~, . any fault or1;.,t.'nating from these lines bec·omes the responsibility of the workers employed by• the owner and not TANE_SC~; ~t.!:1e ,i Company that connects ·the Service lines from t•e main outside to the other electrical line_s within tt)e house. We concur with the learned trial jud,ets find~n~ that "There is s.i•m-ply· nc coge·nt evidence that the •~r'vice·line was faulty and that it had anythin, t~ do with the fire ••• it is conceded that the defendant Company was not· resr,o.nsible for internal wiring."•. We accord-ingl-y · -di-~1-.ss the ap!"e'al"1i'l its entirety.• DATED at DAR ES SALJ,AM thi-s 19th day of June, 1992. L. M. Ml'J<;,ME JUSTICE CF l\PPEAL A. M. A .. OMAR JUSTICE OP' APPEAL L. M. MF/\LILA l JUSTICE OF APPEAL !! I I certify that this is a true copy of the cr:tginal. I lI --r. .-1 •/ / Jjj!{u--·.JJ ·J ( t·~--B. 'KALEGEYA . i . SENIO.R DEPUTY REGISTRAR. I -- --r_---- \;- --· ~-