nyanza cooperative union 1984 ltd vs wk butambala ta butambala co advocates others 2009 tzca 66 25 february 2009

nyanza cooperative union 1984 ltd vs wk butambala ta butambala co advocates others 2009 tzca 66 25 february 2009

The application for leave to appeal was prematurely filed as there was no refusal by the High Court; withdrawal is granted and costs awarded to respondents.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
nyanza cooperative union 1984 ltd vs wk butambala ta butambala co advocates others 2009 tzca 66 25 february 2009
Parties
Applicant: Nyanza Cooperative Union (1984) Ltd; Respondent: W.K. Butambala t/a Butambala & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Amos Njile Lili; Respondent: S.I. Isangi Auction Mart & Court Broker
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
25 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal; Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application withdrawn
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Premature Application, Withdrawal of Application, Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Premature Application Withdrawal of Application Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyanza Cooperative Union (1984) Ltd

Applicant

W.K. Butambala t/a Butambala & Co. Advocates

Respondent

Amos Njile Lili

Respondent

S.I. Isangi Auction Mart & Court Broker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal; Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal was prematurely filed
  2. 2 Entitlement to costs upon withdrawal of application

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave to appeal was prematurely filed as there was no refusal by the High Court; withdrawal is granted and costs awarded to respondents.

Court Disposition

application withdrawn

Orders

  • Leave to withdraw the application is granted under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979.
  • Respondents to be paid costs.