nyanza cooperative union 1984 ltd vs wk butambala ta butambala co advocates others 2009 tzca 66 25 february 2009
The application for leave to appeal was prematurely filed as there was no refusal by the High Court; withdrawal is granted and costs awarded to respondents.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- nyanza cooperative union 1984 ltd vs wk butambala ta butambala co advocates others 2009 tzca 66 25 february 2009
- Parties
- Applicant: Nyanza Cooperative Union (1984) Ltd; Respondent: W.K. Butambala t/a Butambala & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Amos Njile Lili; Respondent: S.I. Isangi Auction Mart & Court Broker
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal; Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- application withdrawn
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Premature Application, Withdrawal of Application, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nyanza Cooperative Union (1984) Ltd
Applicant
W.K. Butambala t/a Butambala & Co. Advocates
Respondent
Amos Njile Lili
Respondent
S.I. Isangi Auction Mart & Court Broker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal; Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal was prematurely filed
- 2 Entitlement to costs upon withdrawal of application
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was prematurely filed as there was no refusal by the High Court; withdrawal is granted and costs awarded to respondents.
Court Disposition
application withdrawn
Orders
- Leave to withdraw the application is granted under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979.
- Respondents to be paid costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
AT PAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 141 OF 2008 NYANZA COOPERATIVE UNION (1984) LTD............................ APPLICANT VERSUS 1. W.K. BUTAMBALA t/a BUTAMBALA & CO. ADVOCATES 2. AMOS NJILE LILI >■........... RESPONDENTS 3. S.I. ISANGI AUCTION MART & COURT BROKER J (Appeal from the ruling and order of the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza) (Mchome, 3.) dated 18th day of June,2007 in Civil Revision No. 2 of 2007 ORDER M3ASIRI. J.A:. This is an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania under Rule 43(b) and 44 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979. The applicant is represented by Mr. R.K. Rweyongeza, learned Advocate. The first respondent is represented by Mr. C. Mutalemwa, learned Advocate and the second respondent by Mr. B. Kabonde, learned Advocate. The respondents have raised preliminary objections, the notice of which has been filed under Rule 100 of the Court Rules. The preliminary objection raised by Mr. Mutalemwa was to the effect that "the application for leave to appeal" is pre-maturely pursued as there is no refusal by the High Court. When the application was called on for hearing Mr. Rweyongeza, learned Advocate for the Applicant readily conceded that the application for leave before the Court has been prematurely brought. He therefore applied to withdraw the application, and asked for costs to be awarded to the respondents. Mr. Mutalemwa and Mr. Kabonde had no objection to the prayer made by Mr. Rweyongeza, but asked for costs. In view of the fact that Mr. Rweyongeza conceded that the court has been moved prematurely; and taking into consideration the no objection by both counsel and the requirements under the law, leave to withdraw the application is hereby granted under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979. Respondents to be paid costs. It is so ordered. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 25th day of February, 2009 S. MJASIRI JUSTICE OF APPEAL ' that this/is iatjjue copy of tt e original. // A p .a .mN IMO DEPUTY REGISTRAR