Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

nzega town council vs dickson mutabuzi mambo harshik tree hotel 2022 tzhc 15194 12 december 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Failure to attach a copy of the decree to the memorandum of appeal is a fatal procedural defect that renders the appeal incompetent.

Court disposition

appeal incompetent

Orders

  • Appeal struck out for want of attachment of decree

02

Material facts

Parties

Nzega Town Council

Appellant Counsel: Ms. Esther John Mlayda

Dickson Mutabuzi Mambo t/a Harshok Tree Hotel

Respondent Counsel: Mr Langa Mvuna

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The trial magistrate erred in law and facts by holding that the appellant is not entitled to collect hotel levy from the respondent and failed to critically analyse and evaluate the appellant’s evidence.
Respondent
The appellant is not entitled to collect hotel levy from the respondent; the trial court considered all evidence and the appellant’s evidence was weak; the respondent is VAT registered and not subject to the hotel levy.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXXIX Rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33, R.E. 2019

    The memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied by a copy of the decree appealed from and (unless the Court dispenses therewith) of the judgement on which it is founded.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Failure to attach a copy of the decree to the memorandum of appeal is a fatal procedural defect that renders the appeal incompetent.

Court disposition

appeal incompetent

  • Appeal struck out for want of attachment of decree

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 12 December 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 12 December 2022

nzega town council vs dickson mutabuzi mambo harshik tree hotel 2022 tzhc 15194 12 december 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA

AT TABORA DC. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2020 (Arising from Nzega District Court Civil Case No. 8/2018) NZEGA TOWN COUNCIL........................................... APPELLANT

VERSUS

DICKSON MUTABUZI MAMBO HARSHOK TREE HOTEL..................................... RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT Date of Last Order: 21/10/2022 Date of Delivery: 12/12/2022 AMOUR S. KHAMIS, J: In Civil Case No 8 of 2018 of the District Court of Nzega, Nzega Town Council sued Dickson Mutabuzi Mambo t/a Harshok Tree Motel for payment of hotel levy from July 2015 to February 2018. On 28/5/2020 the District Court of Nzega delivered its Judgement dismissing the suit. Aggrieved with the whole Judgement and Decree of the trial Court, Nzega Town Council filed the present appeal on two grounds, namely; 1. That the Hon. Magistrate erred in law and facts by holding that the appellant is not entitled to collect hotel levy to the respondent. 1 2. That the Hon. Magistrate erred in law and facts for failure to critically analyse and evaluate the Appellant’s evidence and arrived at unfair decision. Upon being served with the Memorandum of Appeal, Dickson Mutabuzi Mambo t/a Harshok Tree Hotel, filed a reply to the Memorandum of Appeal, thus; 1. That, the contents of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the appellant’s Memorandum of Appeal are collectively vehemently disputed and the appellant is strictly put into strict proof thereof.

2. That the trial Court did no error in reaching into the said decision as appellant is not entitled to collect hotel levy from the respondent.

3. That the trial Court considered all the evidence of each party and did not disregard the evidence of the appellant but rather the same evidence was weak to warrant a judgment on the part of the appellant.

4. Further, that the respondent is a Value Tax registered person and is not subjected to pay hotel levy charged by the appellant. Before me, Ms. Esther John Mlayda, learned solicitor, appeared for Nzega Town Council while Mr Langa Mvuna, learned advocate, acted for the respondent. 2 The appeal was disposed of by way of written submissions and parties observed the timeline set by the Court. I have read and considered the parties’ rival submissions However, gone through the record, I observed that this appeal was filed without attaching copy of the decree extracted from judgement of the District Court. In my view, this is fatal in view of the legal requirements outlined in Order XXXIX Rule 1(1) of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, CAP 33, R.E. 2019 which states that: **........ the memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied by a copy of the decree appealed from and (unless the Court dispenses therewith) of the judgement on which it is founded”.

6. The above provision is couched in mandatory form and failure to attach such a decree renders the appeal incompetent. Judgement delivered in Chambers in presence of Ms. Esther J. Mlayda, solicitor and absence of the respondent. 3 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order XXXIX Rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33, R.E. 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.