nzega town council vs magdalena robert golden land hotel 2022 tzhc 15182 12 december 2022
The appeal is incompetent because it was filed without attaching a copy of the decree from the District Court as required by law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- nzega town council vs magdalena robert golden land hotel 2022 tzhc 15182 12 december 2022
- Parties
- Appellant: Nzega Town Council; Respondent: Magdalena Robert (Golden Land Hotel)
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Decree Attachment Requirement, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nzega Town Council
Appellant
Magdalena Robert (Golden Land Hotel)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is competent without attachment of the decree from the lower court
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is incompetent because it was filed without attaching a copy of the decree from the District Court as required by law.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out
Orders
- The appeal is struck out for incompetence due to failure to attach the decree from the lower court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT TABORA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2020 (Arising from Nzega District Court Civil Case No. 12/2018) NZEGA TOWN COUNCIL........... ..... APPELLANT VERSUS MAGDALENA ROBERT (GOLDEN LAND HOTEL)............ ............ ......RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Date of Last Order: 21/10/2022 Date of Delivery: 12/12 /2022 AMOUR S. KHAMIS, J: Nzega Town Council was the plaintiff in Civil Case No. 12/2020 filed in the District Court of Nzega whose judgment was delivered on 09/6/2020 in favour of Magdalena Robert t/a Golden Land Hotel. Aggrieved by the whole judgment and decree of the trial Court, Nzega Town Council filed this appeal on two grounds, thus: 1. That the Hon. Magistrate erred in law and facts by holding that the appellant is not entitled to collect Hotel levy to the Respondent. 2. That the Hon. Magistrate erred in law and facts for failure to critically analyse and evaluate the appellant’s evidence and arrived at unfair decision. i Upon being served with a Memorandum of Appeal, Magdalena Robert t/a Golden Land Hotel, filed a reply to the Petition of Appeal, thus: 1. That, the contents of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the appellant’s memorandum of appeal are collectively vehemently disputed and the appellant is strictly put into strict proof thereof. 2. That, the trial Court did no error in reaching into the said decision as appellant is not entitled to collect hotel levy from the respondent. 3. That the trial Court considered all the evidence of each party and did not disregard the evidence of the appellant but rather the same evidence was weak to warrant a judgment on the part of the appellant. 4. Further, that the respondent is a value added tax registered person and is not subject to pay hotel levy charged by the appellant Before, me Nzega Town Council enjoyed legal services of Ms. Esther John Mlayda, learned solicitor while Mr. Langa Mvuna, learned advocate, appeared for the respondent. The appeal was canvassed by way of written submissions and parties dutifully complied to the timeline set by the Court. I have read and considered parties’ rival submissions. 2 However, upon examination of the records, I observed that the appeal was filed without attaching copy of the decree extracted from judgement of the District Court sought to be challenged. The law makes it mandatory for every appeal to the High Court to be attached with copy of the decree of the lower Court. Order XXXIX Rule 1(1) of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, CAP 33, R.E. 2019 provides that: ".......... the memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied by a copy of the decree appealed from District Court and (unless the Court dispenses therewith) of the judgement on which it is founded”. 6. In this appeal, the Memorandum of Appeal was accompanied by copy of the impugned judgment but copy of the decree was omitted and thus rendering the whole appeal incompetent. For the aforestated reasons, this appeal hereby struck out with Judgment delivered in Chambers in presence of Ms. Esther John Mlayda, learned solicitor for the appellant and in absence of the respondent. 3 4