Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

20170222 tzhc arusha

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicants demonstrated a common interest in the intended suit as the claims arose from a common scheme, fulfilling the requirements of Order I Rule 8(1) CPC. Leave to file a representative suit is granted.

Court disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicants to file the representative suit within 30 days from the date of the order.
  • Notice of the institution of the suit to all interested persons to be conveyed by public advertisement in at least one Swahili and one English national circulating newspaper as well as in the Public Notice Boards.
  • No order as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Obadia Habil Mwisolwa

Applicant

Lothy Kisiri

Applicant

Eva Samuel

Applicant

DECI Limited

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Total Amount Deposited: TZS 54,512,000
  • Minimum Individual Deposit: TZS 10,000
  • Maximum Individual Deposit: TZS 18,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Representative Suit

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicants have satisfied the requirements for leave to file a representative suit under Order I Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants and 25 others share a common interest, having deposited money with the 1st respondent under a scheme with a promise of returns, and seek to file a representative suit due to the commonality of their claims.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order I Rule 8(1) of the Civil Procedure Code

    Where numerous persons have the same interest in one suit, one or more may, with court permission, sue or be sued on behalf of all, with notice to all interested persons.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicants demonstrated a common interest in the intended suit as the claims arose from a common scheme, fulfilling the requirements of Order I Rule 8(1) CPC. Leave to file a representative suit is granted.

Court disposition

Application allowed

  • Applicants to file the representative suit within 30 days from the date of the order.
  • Notice of the institution of the suit to all interested persons to be conveyed by public advertisement in at least one Swahili and one English national circulating newspaper as well as in the Public Notice Boards.
  • No order as to costs.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 22 February 2017

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 22 February 2017

20170222 tzhc arusha

1l_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF T't'E UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA I [IN THE DISTRI<;:T REGISTRY OF ARUSHA] !

AT ARUSHA i MISC- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 198 OF 2015 I ' 1. OBADIA HABIL MWISOLWA .......................... 1ST APPLICANT 2. LOTHY KISIRI .............................................. 2ND APPLICANT 3. EVA SAMUEL •••••••••••••••• l ••••••..•.•.•••.•••••.••••••••••• 3RD APPLICANT I \VERSUS 1. DECI LIMITED ............................................. 1ST RESPONDENT ' :. ND 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL. ... ~ ............................. 2 RESPONDENT . I 3. PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCEi. ............................ 3RD RESPONDENT

RULING I S.M. MAGHIMBI, l This is a ruling upon an ex-parte application brought under the provisions of Order I Rule 8 of the Civil Prbcedure Code Act, Cap. 33 R.E 2002. The I applicant are praying that this Honorable Court be pleased to grant leave to permit the applicants to !file a representative suit against the respondents herein. The application was supported by joint affidavit of the I applicants. The substance of the application as per the sworn affidavit of the applicants is that the applicants and 25 others to be represented share a common interest, having depoJited money with the 1st respondent with a I promise to receive more than double the amount so deposited within a span of 6-8 weeks from the date· of deposit. The applicants along with the 1 25 others deposited different sums of money ranging from 10,000/- to 18,000,000/- totaling to a sum Tshs. 54,512,000/- vide a program called "Tushikamane Revolving Fund" or "Saw and Harvest". That vide the order of the 3rd respondent, the 1st respondent breached the terms of the agreement by stopping the payments as agreed, a breach which is alleged to have affected the normal economic lives of the applicants and their families. Order I Rule 8(1) of the CPC provides: 8.-(1) Where there are numerous person having the same interest in one suit, one or more of such persons may, with the permission of the court, sue or be sued,

or may defend, in such suit, on behalf of or for the benefit of all p(;rsons so interested,· but the court shall in such case give, at the plaintiff's expense, notice of the institution of the suit to all such persons either by personal service or, where from the number of persons or any other cause such service is not reasonably practicable, by public advertisement, as the court in each case may direct. As per the supporting affidavit; the applicants herein have shown a common interest in the intended suit as the amount to be claimed was sent via a common scheme. For that reason, I am satisfied that the conditions set in Order I Rule .8(1) of the CPC are fulfilled. Consequently, this application is hereby allowed and the Court proceeds to make the following orders: 2 ; ' I I 1. The applicants herein shall ifile I the repr~sentative suit within 30 I ,: I days from the date of this o1der.

2. Notice of the institution of ~he suit to all su¢h person~ interested 1 I, in the matter shall be conyeyed by publici advertisement in at least one Swahili and one E1glish Nationa~ Ci,rculating Newspapers as well as in the Public Notiqe j Boards. I 1 ! .

3. No order as to costs. 1 1 • 1 Application Allowed. • : I Dated at Arusha thi! 22 ndday of Feb~uary, 2017 ! ' I I i i: I SGD: s. l[M. MAGHIMBI i .I lJUDGE 22}02/2017 i I ji I I hereby certify that this to be a t~ue copy of the original. ! i I i: i\ I DEPU~ REGISTRAR , ' I I II : HIGH COURT - ARUSHA : \\i)-ie,1 i 3 I '

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order I Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code Act, Cap. 33 R.E 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.