odira adek makenge vs onyango chore 2009 tzhc 101 12 june 2009
The appellant had no legal right to the disputed plot, as the respondent was the rightful owner by virtue of allocation by the Village Council in 1979 and continuous, uninterrupted occupation for over twelve years. The appellant's claim was unfounded and amounted to unlawful use of the respondent's land.
- Citation
- odira adek makenge vs onyango chore 2009 tzhc 101 12 june 2009
- Parties
- Appellant: Odira Adek Makenge; Respondent: Onyango Chore
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Land Ownership, Trespass, Allocation of Land, Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Odira Adek Makenge
Appellant
Onyango Chore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has any right to the disputed plot
- 2 Whether the respondent is the rightful owner of the disputed land
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant had no legal right to the disputed plot, as the respondent was the rightful owner by virtue of allocation by the Village Council in 1979 and continuous, uninterrupted occupation for over twelve years. The appellant's claim was unfounded and amounted to unlawful use of the respondent's land.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment